UK Social Work Theories
The yarn is an dissection of theories underpinning and key elements of censorious collective toil and its rates. Furtherexalt I conciliate investigate Counselling as one of the areas of collective toil action and how it is biasd by the censorious collective toil vestibule in action. I conciliate involve illustrations from action trial and learning and so highlight the bias of inequalities, potentiality and collective divisions. The indicateations of labor users and their assipattern towards the action conciliate so be captivaten into indicateation in the yarn.
Social toil in the UK dates end to the 19th as a company and kind breath to assipattern the hindranced and deficient. From the kind and company origins it plain in force to a sstrive that boon at challenging disparity, injustice; prefer collective inclusion/ collective impartiality and insurrection Parrot (2002). Through these rates and boon Collective Toil expansiveened its familiarity deep and plain into Censorious collective toil. Wooster (2002) assistances the aloft origins when he notices that Collective toil owes its origins to Christian strength than a commitment to collective heights forcible indivisibles. Aftercited the economic exigency in the UK in the 1970s due to escalating oil prices collective outcomes affect deficient housing, unemployment, indigence and wilderness collective toil displaceed and expansiveened its rendezvous and balmy to harangue collective outcomes and heights. (Grimwood et al., (1995).
Adams et al (2009) notices that in attempting to harangue collective heights, hindrance and inequalities collective toil practitioners like drawn familiarity and fancys from unundoubtful disciplines such as sociology, psychology, philosophy and politics. From this multi-disciplinary familiarity deep the underpinning ideology was anti extortionate doctrine which provides presumptive tools to recognize, lapse and corcorrespond to the involved trial of injustice. This instrument collective toil practitioners like a presumptive, incorporeal and legitimate obligation to brave inequalities and hindrance.
Critical action can be deduced and associated delay unsparing collective toil in the 1960s-70s deriving fancys from Marxist plea Fook (1993). Unsparing collective toil upheld the aftercited themes: structural dissection of separate heights, ongoing collective sensibility chiefly rendezvousing on extortionate fancys/action and goals of stubborn dismissal and collective alter. Parallel to these traditions empowering and anti-extortionate action to nationality in investigation and company toil. Several key doctrines were shared from unsparing sensibilitys to introduce censorious collective toil which are: challenging dominant forces and inpropriety in all produces, a sensibility of positivist fancys and the insufficiency to brave dominant manufactured ways of acute by developing other ways of acute. This would be consummated through recognising that familiarity may ruminate subpattern but may so be collectively manufactured. In ordain to cause exalt/new familiarity stubborn ruminateion and interaction are ascititious tools using message processes.
Marx analysed the cardinal company he feedd in Germanifold and demonstrated that the organizations delayin company conservative from the adjustification and the alters in the industrial mold biasd some vilealty to be exalt potentialityful and others not. Men-folks were restrained by the demands of Capitalism fruiting in organization/agency height at the expenditure of organization. Marx highlighted outcomes of taburecent and taburecent pains where there is a pains unordered potentialityful and potentialityless fruiting in divergent societal tabulatees. As such a standing prevails that those in potentiality conciliate endeavor to seal in potentiality at whatever absorb and instrument in-great-measure exploitation of the potentialityless by depriving them of their opportunities and way to facilities. Rush (2004) exalt notices that Marxist censorious plea is not picturesquely but a instrument of influencing collective alter by mound awareness of forces delayin company that adduces disparity and highlighting how awareness can aid indivisibles to overdominion such forces and disgain themselves.
Critical thinking is so linked to Marx and Socilogists from the Frankfurt Train of Sociologists (Horkeimer (1979), Adorno (Adorno and Horkeimer, (1979) and Marcuse (1964) from the 1920s/30s and Habermas (1984, 1987) congeniality in the recent twentieth senility. These theorists held that collective voluptuousness was deepd on assumptions of a unwandering collective ordain chiefly conservative from faith, politics and collective permissions. When this collective ordain precise character unvile and braved. Sociologists demonstrated that familiarity of the envinonment bring-abouts indivisibles exalt operative (Gerth and Mills (1948) and Durkeim (1972) precise that if we recognize how collective intercommunitys toil we would be potent to consummate our objectives in company. This is how censorious thinking in modernist way is encircling and it was messageed ‘modernism’ but has expansive and embraced other theories restless delay intercharge and collective alter. Gray and Webb (2008) demonstrate that censorious plea is variation from the Frankfurt train but at the identical space it has not elucidated its censorious deep. (Allan et al 2003; Fook 2002; Healey 2000) acfamiliarity that there is tone in defining censorious plea as it comprises divergent theories, some demonstrate that it is an umbrella message that encompasses a rank of theories and vestibulees including Marxist, unsparing, feminist, anti-racist, anti-oppressive, anti-discriminatory, column colonial , censorious inventivist and structural perspectives. This insinuates that there are manifold theories although divergent they all try to recognize the interco-ordination unordered an indivisible and company.
For the end of clarity and simultaneousness I conciliate at this adjust elucidate censorious collective toil action and highlight its rates. Adams et al (2009) indicateation censorious action as involving exercising one’s judgement in a ruminateive and separate mode. It involves exploring divergent discretions in a standing or actions in judging the best way to harangue outcomes. The practitioner would rerepresentation their fancys, perspectives and discretions of others anteriorly deciding a “best way wilful-assertive.” This is underpinned by the reality of accepting alter and simultaneousness as practitioners attack divergent standings and fancys. Payne et al (2002) exalt notices that in ordain to discharge the requirements of censorious action which involve discharge and entitlement collective toilers insufficiency an public remembrance, ruminateive pattern that encompasses separate perspectives, trial and assumptions. This would fruit in acknowledging indivisible differences, resembling convenience and i-elation. Fook and Garner (2007) exalt authenticate three aspects of censorious action which are censorious thinking, censorious action and reflexivity as ascititious tools to gain when endeavoring collective impartiality and alter.
In up-hill to harangue collective injustices and disparity collective toil uses a medley of skills and familiarity deepd on plea perspective and mannerology. This empowers collective toilers to put in settle intrusion which is divert to indivisible case. This intrusion empowers collective toilers delay skills to gain labor users to adduce overbearing outcomes. Censorious collective toil is so apprised by rates which overlap the transmitted collective toil rates. The rate of collective impartiality is upheld from the reality that censorious action is a presumptive breath and as such callingals are so presumptive sovereigns.
This is exalt assistanceed by Thompson (2006) when he insinuates that Company comprises of a separate rank of vilealty in which collective divisions appear which in mold produces the societal organizations which networks intercommunitys, institutions and ordainings. These ordainings detailize, moderate and regurecent the adjustification of potentiality, claim, foothold and opportunities fruiting in collective stratification and fruit. From these ordainings nevertheless it is leading to notice that fraud, disparity and inpropriety is witnessed in the ordain of vilealty who are vulnerpotent and marginalised.
From these theories we can deduce the fancys of censorious perspective and acfamiliarity that the potentialityless can bias device company indicateations from the oppressors. The presumptive bud instrumented by labor users was the theorising of unfitness from the medicalised voluptuousness to collective pattern of unfitness. This disfix was championed by disabled vilealty’s motions to bisecticular how they felt and were treated for exalt than a senility. This disfix and plea biasd societal attitudes, biasd policies and to some quantity alterd societal attitudes in UK and abroad. (Abberley,1998; Barnes, 1998). (Morris, 1993) assistances this by noticeing that the unfitness motion has overhauled societal perceptions and upheld disabled vilealty’s hues to feed independently,prefer anti discriminatory action, simplicity and resembling opportunities.
Harris and White (2009) exalt investigated accidents and alters delayin the thrift recite from administering to managing the thrift recite. They observed that the Conservative “1979 -1997” and Labour “1997-2010” were biasd by neo-liberalist fancys. This fancy upheld the permission that communicate was loftier to the recite and as such callingals including collective toilers were mediumt to instrument competitive council device and vestibulees to as global standards. These alters fictitious the vulnerpotent vilealty in company as polite-behaved-behaved accordingly regulaters had been fond the potentialitys to say on their bestead. These alters, debates and contradictions like put Collective Toil action into a altercationed dilema calling. Although this voluptuousness recites that “Social toil is a calling that prefers collective alter, height solving in anthropological intercommunitys and the entitlement and discharge of vilealty to improve polite-behaved-being”. (International Federation of Collective Workers, 2000 p1).
Fook (2002) so demonstrates that censorious collective toil action should be restless delay promoting a company delayout rule, exploitation and injustice. In ordain to consummate this practitioners insufficiency to ruminate, reinvent and jumble exalt processes for alter through mindful hawking delayin the dominant framework. Parton et al (1997) apexs out that the introduce gregarious environment is dominantly global, modernized and authoritarian. As such policies are apprised and organized by communicate doctrines which prescribes and narrows callingal boundaries which affects the hues of labor users. In ordain to consummate their objectives collective toilers insufficiency to brave and rebuff the authoritarian elements by habituateing censorious action.
Adams et al (1998) exalt identifies that Systems plea is another elder presumptive beginning underpinning collective toil. The plans plea emphasised that vilealty’s nature is detailized by the environment they feed or gain-ground in. It highlighted that vilealty’s heights are a fruit of how they interact delay their rebeginning “systems” which are either precise or loose. The inprecise involve friends, neighbours and colleagues. The precise involve assipattern ordains/ collective clubs and fraternitys. The public/ societal involve housing ,hospitals, toil and train which provides undoubtful organization or detail habituatement in company. The plan plea encourages gain-groundth and provides a swerve rank of solutions to heights by authenticateing areas of increase or insufficiencying increase. Nevertheless it is said not to be acknowledging potentiality differences delayin company and delay divergent roles. Furtherexalt (Coulshed and Orme, 1998) sharp out that the character of variation in company bring-abouts it opposed to be entirely contingent on one plea or vestibule. Divergent standings and divergent case entails divergent vestibulees through ruminateive actions and perspectives.
Many censorious collective theorists like braved the nature of a collective ordain and like questioned collective ordain as evidenced in the toil of Habermas (1984, 1987) who distinguishes unordered the plan and the concerneruniverse which interact and casually altercation delay each other. The plan indicates the organizations affect the council departments, transnational companies emerging from globalisation, fancys preferd by communicative rationalistic, ordain and media.All these organizations are relaying a universe indicateation through divergent rationalistic. aAs such Collective toil is not embracing as an sovereign of planatic regulaterialism in agencies.
(Fook 2002 and Gardner 2007) exalt highlighted exquisite produces of censorious plea which are feminism and column modernism. They like divergent indicateations from Marxist indicateations and the Frankfurt sociologists in that they rendezvous on the recognizeing that the universe ruminates separate trial and collective unromantic texture. They demonstrate that separate trial invents and is manufactured by the universe we feed in. They upholder to attending to vilealty’s trials (narratives) seriously and from these we can hear how they indicateation and trial the universe in divergent ways. This is assistanceed by the feminists when they highlight that the hifiction of trials by indivisibles imparts us a explication on how they invent the universe and how they shortness to gain delay their heights and standings. Thus columnmodernists say there is an exquisite way of indicateationing the universe than what it seems to be. Postmodernity demonstrate there is a divergent way of indicateationing the universe and divergent ways to dispense delay societal prtoblemsa hereafter censorious collective toil endeavors for divergent discretions and captivate the best way wilful-assertive.
In ordain for all these theories to be instrumented there should be touch delay indivisibles in company who trial disparity and hindrance. Furtherexalt it is so leading to notice at this apex that collective toil intrusion and action is expansive and spreads into other disciplines. Groupwork, Counselling, Advocacy and Assessment are illustrations of divergent produces of practising collective toil. I conciliate not rendezvous on the expansiveness of disciplines but conciliate rendezvous on the boon of the yarn which are to investigate how the censorious collective toil vestibule biass warningling. Counselling requires a lot of skills and vestibulees as it endeavors to harangue and dictate indivisible fixs, conclusion making and resolving outcomes.
According to BAC warningling is a exalt dedisgain breath and in its voluptuousness of the message the British Fraternity for Counselling spells out the good-behavior unordered a calculated and a wilful-generated accident. ‘People gpursuit gaind in warningling when a special, occupying constantly or temporarily the role of pleader, adduces or agrees explicitly to adduce space, heed and i-elation to another special or specials temporarily in the role of client.’ According to Dryden (2004:40), it is picturesquely as doctrined interco-ordination characteristics by the contact of one or exalt metaphysical theories and a recognised set of message skills, mitigated by trial, insight and other interseparate realityors, to clients’ near moments, heights or aspirations. Its superior ethos is one of facilitation rather than of information-giving or restraint. It may be of very tiny or crave term, captivate settle in an organisational or secret action elucidation and may or may not overlap delay useful, medical and other matters of separate thrift.
From the aloft voluptuousnesss and tracing the unromanticly it is plum collective toilers were /and are quiescent gaind in warningling as highlighted by the Barclay narration in the forthcoming 1980s which noticeed that it was ascititious for collective toilers to gain in warningling as it aided to gain delay indivisibles to aid them regulate their heights, worries and anxieties. Barclay Committee, (1982). This is no craveer the standing today as noted by Brearley (1995) gregarious, administrative, legislative alters and ideologies like fictitious the interco-ordination unordered warningling and collective; toil. Some collective toil practitioners are in fix as to when they can do warningling or not and where to begin delay warningling and when to seal. Accordingly collective toilers own-effect in a legislative, organisational, ideological, rate and incorporeal texture it is neat increasingly opposed to gain in warningling delayout meddling boundaries. Furtherexalt the economic environment, budget cuts and after a whiledrawal of materials bring-abouts it opposed to contrivance and habituate uncontested intrusions.
However opposing the aloft constraints collective toilers at some apex push out warningling as not pushing it out would return their job uneven and enfeebled.
There are a compute of Counselling theories which are Special centred, consistential, Cognitive behavioural (CBT),motivational, anthropologicalistic, psychodynamic, Karpman’s (1969) Drama triangle and broad and intergrative vestibulees. Some of the theories like been criticised as uneven and rebeginning straining. One vestibule that is laudatory to collective toil is the broad/ integrative vestibule.
Integrative plea is a manner of intrusion that ass the insufficiencys introduceed by the client and bisecticular case. The benefits of this vestibule are that it is pliant and inoculatepotent to client insufficiencys. McLeod (2003) assistances this recitement when he notices thevestibule enables the pleader to prefer the best discretion and techniques from a rank of theories to as the client insufficiencys. It can medium habituateing divergent elements from divergent theories to mix them into a new suitpotent pattern or plea.This honors delay one of the collective toil theories of broadism which endeavors to intergrate divergent theories to lapse ( name)
It can be demonstrated that the boon of collective toil and the boon of warningling are twain rendezvousing on indivisibles and their interaction delay the company, heights they countenance and how they operation-out them. As Egan 2006 puts it and flatteryed by Coulshed and Orme 2006 collective toilers inoculate skills that flattery warningling skills some of them are empathy or recognizeing,respect, stubborn familiarity and vindication and virtuous. Although there are criticisms on Egan’s toil as character illiterate of psychodynamic fancys mediuming it has poor contact and operativeness. A ruminateive practitioner would endeavor to prefer collective impartiality, anti -extortionate and anti-discvriminatory action deepd on familiarity to prefer embracing action. Twain callings are character braved by increasing learning developing and insufficiency to gain in best action and censorious action to gain all indivisibles and communities.
My claim as a collective toiler toiling delay clients is that I like habitual familiarity and on rates of collective toil outcomes and intrusion. I so like a bwithdrawal African endground which has some altercationing rates to collective toil. I conciliate rendezvous on the collective toil rates to overdominion any prejudices and biases which may jeopardise my toil. I so like the law on my interest which conciliate imbisect me potentiality to lapse and action. From my trial as a caseworker at RA I used warningling as a technique to toiling delay clients. Clients from divergent endground wayed the labor to dictate their migration matters. In-great-measure the vestibule we used was special centred vestibule which mediumt clients were treated as indivisibles and fond information touching to their migration outcomes
My oneness imparts me a claim accordingly I like my own rates. I am bwithdrawal African student collective toiler. I nave my rates, familiarity and prejudices which can impression on the way I conciliate rerecent delay clients when in action. I conciliate not own my own rates and prejudices bias my action. I conciliate gain in ruminateive action and use the censorious collective toil vestibule discussed in this yarn. Clients like their own indicateations, way of concerner and voluptuousness of the universe. My role is to prefer collective impartiality to the vilealty I toil delay in ordain for them to like exquisite and insurrection. . This is assistanceed by Carrniol 2005 when they notice that it is leading for collective toilers to condense their principle into their collective precipitation and claim as the original step towards empowering clients and challenging injustice.
In my antecedent role as caseworker for refugees and harbor endeavorers I toiled and triald that men from other ameliorations do not cry accordingly of their faith. My permission rates say if a special is hurting they cry. So handshakes are bisect of my amelioration to compliment but others do not handshake. Appointments delay Muslims on Friday afternoon were not divert as they notice mosque. I would endeavor to imbisect appointments on another day. Giving Muslims women bring-environing caseworkers to warning they won’t talk imbisect them women? I conciliate signcolumn vilealty to their own company ordains to imbisect aid and assistance. Once you attend to somebody’s heights you are warningling. I overcame all these by putting the insufficiencys of clients original anteriorly my own.
Privilege as picturesquely by Bailey (1998:109) is planically, acquired advantages indivisibles like for character members of a dominants few delay way to materials and institutional potentiality that are departed the vile advantages of marginalised citizens Sidanius and Pratto 1999 exalt insinuate that an indivisible’s claim is conservative from their company or fraternity to claimd ordains rather than their separate consummatement. According to Ixer 199 it is leading to test claim censoriously in two ways i.e. how it benefits the claimd special and how it affects the indivisible who does not have it. In censorious collective toil action collective toiler insufficiency to ruminate upon what causes claim and investigate the socio gregarious fruit of an indivisible’s height than rendezvous on their talent to strive. (Fook 1999 Morley 2004)
Carniola (2005) observed that collective toilers is in the exact bearing of developing censorious sense encircling the metaphysical impression of inpropriety on indivisibles. He exalt bisecticulared that there is moment on the quality of awareness unordered collective toilers on the impression of claim or dominant foothold on indivisible’s subjectivities and universe indicateations. Rossitter (2000) echoes the identical sentiments when he notices that the position/ impression and ways in which callingals gain delay clients is overlooked and underestimated as they have a undoubtful taburecent in the produce of gender, pursuit, and sexual claim.
It is leading to highlight at this adjust the rates of censorious collective toil action. It is leading to notice that rates are in divergent categories ranging from separate, organisational, incorporeal, institutional gregarious and divine. Values can altercation each other as polite-behaved-behaved and collectively manufactured. Transmitted Collective toil rates and censorious collective toil rates overlap and are deepd on Biestek 1961 and consists of the aftercited: Individualism, non judgemental, stubborn voluptuousness, endful bisecticularion and moderateled emotional bud. In column modernity messages these can be interpreted to preferment of collective impartiality, dismissal, anti-oppressive, anti-discriminatory, entitlement, non judgemental and i-elation and good-behavior. As discussed these are rates that underpi censorious collective toil for it to consist.
Critical collective toil as discussed investigates the best way wilful-assertive to indivisibles heights and endeavors to attend and gain delay the indivisible to promulgate their fiction and toil in bisectnership to invent the best way wilful-assertive. The limitation is censorious collective toil is concealed by superficial forces which are departed it moderate. For illustration materials in the exoteric economic air globally and at home. It is so criticised as its rates and origins are Eurocentric and do not reintroduce boundless case as what seems to toil in UK capacity not necessarily toil in Afro/ Asian communities. For illustration the outcome of confidentiality is rated and ascititious in UK and Europe inasmuch-as in Afro Asian ameliorations they rate kinship assipattern in spaces of pain. Nevertheless they would not shortness anyone else outinterest the kinship clique to recognize encircling their standing. This adduces inrterpretation heights to confidentialtity.
Having investigated censorious collective toil action and theories underpinning it it is leading to acfamiliarity that there is continuos intercharge and altercation delayin the academic sstrive and socio-gregarious ground. This is extremely impressioning on vulnerpotent vilealty and how they are treated and marginalised in outcomes forcible their feeds. If the rates of censorious collective toil could bre dischargeled and the theories underpinning it are intergrated collective toil and warningling would be forces for alter to prefer collective impartiality.
Abberley, P. (1998), The Spectre At The Feast:Disabled vilealty and collective plea, in, Shakespeare, T., (editor), (1998), The Unfitness Reader: Collective Science Perspectives, London, Cassell, pp79-93.
Adams. R, Dominelli. L and Payne, M. (2009) Censorious Action in Collective Toil 2nd Edition Basingstoke,Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Barnes, C. (1998), The Collective Pattern Of Disability: A sociological inquisitiveness ignored by sociologists?, in Shakespeare, T., (editor), (1998), The Unfitness Reader: Collective Science Perspectives, London, Cassell, pp65-78.
Barnes C and Mercer G. (1997), (editors), Doing Unfitness Research, Leeds, The Unfitness Press.
” (Fook, J, & Gardner, F (2007) Practising Censorious Reflection: A Rebeginning Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Public University Press, New York).
Harris, J. and White, V. (2009) Modernising Collective Toil Censorious Considerations Bristol: Device Press.
Morris, J. (1993), Incontingent Lives: Company concern and disabled vilealty, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Beresford, P. (1997), The Last Collective Division?: Revisiting the interco-ordination unordered collective device, its producers and consumers, in, May, M., Brunsdon, E., Craig, G., (editors), Collective Device Rerepresentation 9, London, Collective Device Association, pp203-226.
Beresford P and Campbell J. (1994) Disabled People, Labor Users, User Involvement And Representation, Unfitness And Society, Volume 9, No 3, pp315-325.
Beresford, P. and Croft, S. (1993), Citizen Involvement: A useful conduct for alter, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Beresford, P., Stalker, K. and Wilson, A. (1997), Speaking For Ourselves: A bibliography, London, Public Services Project in fraternity delay the Collective Toil Investigation Centre, University of Stirling.
Beresford, P. and Turner, M. (1997), It’s Our Welfare, Narration of the Citizens’ Commission on the Forthcoming of the Thrift State, London, National Institute for Collective Work.
Beresford, P. (1999) Storming The Millennium, Lawrence and Wishart, London,
Campbell, P. (1996), The Hifiction Of The User Motion In The United Kingdom, in T Heller, J Reynolds, R Gomm, R Muston and S Pattison, (editors), Mental Health Matters, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Campbell, J. and M, Oliver, M. (1996), Unfitness Politics: Intellect our departed, changing our forthcoming, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Coulshed, V. and Orme, J. (1998), Collective Toil Practice: An gate, third edition, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
(Rush, 2004:10) Rush, F. (Ed). (2004). The cambridge mate to censorious plea. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, S. and Beresford, P. (1993), Getting Involved: A useful manual for alter, London, Public Services Project/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Croft, S. and Beresford, P. (1998), Postmodernity And The Forthcoming Of Welfare: Whose sensibilitys, whose collective device? in John Carter, (editor), (1998), Postmodernity And The Fragmentation Of Welfare, London, Routledge, pp103-120.
Croft, S. and Beresford, P, (1996), The Politics Of Participation, in, Taylor, D. (editor), Censorious Collective Policy: A reader, London, Sage, pp175-198.
Davies, M. (editor), (1997), The Blackwell-behaved Mate To Collective Work, Oxford, Blackwell.
Evans C and Fisher M, (1999), Collaborative Evaluation Delay Labor Users: Moving towards user moderateled investigation, in Shaw, I. and Lishman,J. (editors), Evaluation And Collective Toil Practice, London, Sage.
Giddens, A. (1998), The Third Way: The exercise of collective democracy, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Harding, S. (1993), Rethinking Standapex Epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity?, in Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (editors), Feminist Epistemologies, London, Routledge.
Jones, C. (1996), Anti-Intellectualism And The Peculiarities Of British Collective Toil Education, in Parton, N. (editor), Collective Theory, Collective Alter And Collective Work, London, Routledge.
Mayer, J.E. and Timms, N. (1970), The Client Speaks: Agoing taburecent impressions of casework, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Oliver, M. (1996), Intellect Disability: From plea to action, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Payne, M., (1997), Modern Collective Toil Theory: Second Edition, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Pembroke, L. R. (editor), (1994a), Eating Distress: Perspectives From Separate Experience, London, Survivors Say Out.
Pembroke, L. R. (editor), (1994b), Stubborn Harm: Perspectives from separate trial, London, Survivors Say Out.
Priestley, M., (1999), Unfitness Politics And Company Care, London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Read, J. and Reynolds, J. (editors), (1996), Speaking Our Minds: An anthology, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Oliver, M. and Barnes, C. (1998), Disabled Commonalty And Society: From disconnection to inclusion, London, Longman.
Shakespeare, T., (editor), (1998), The Unfitness Reader: Collective Science Perspectives, London, Cassell.
Wiltshire and Swindon Users Network, (1996), I Am In Control, Devizes, Wiltshire and Swindon Users Network.