Domestic Violence and A Mandatory Arrest

Domestic force is a grave substance in today’s company. According to FBI statistics, encircling 4 pet incidents of domiciliary force happen throughout each year in the United States. The FBI propounds, “In the United States of America, a man thrashs a dame whole 12 assists” (Mordini, 2004). Mordini, an ally at the Davis Brown Law Firm, conducted a examine that set-up almost 3.3 pet deduction voucher acts of domiciliary force each year and that 70% of men who thrash their wives so affront their deduction. Domiciliary force costs American businesses $4 billion dollars each year in the “low” productivity, staff turnover, nonresidence, and exorbitant use of medical benefits (Mordini, 2004).

During the coming 1970’s and 1980’s, investigation and studies on domiciliary force gather spiritclose opineation to the end. Since the intermediate of the 1980’s, avowal of domiciliary force has fruited in the substance of variation from a junior general regard to a main cunning end. Since 1994 fantastical, the calcudeceased of new laws unconditional over the kingdom that dispense delay domiciliary force is polite-mannered-mannered aggravate 1,500 and the calcudeceased of bills make-knownd during this identical opportunity is estimated to be encircling 10 to 20,000 (Miller 2005). In regudeceased for mandatory hold laws on domiciliary force to be put into action there were grave questions happenring on how police officers can shape an hold if they keep credible origin that domiciliary force has in appearrence happenred.

During the mid to deceased 1980’s, a calcudeceased of propounds adopted such laws as an endeavor to battle domiciliary force and to modeobjurgate police bearing. However, there is no plain contract unmoulded politicians, law enforcement officials and investigationers on the ownership that mandatory hold policies keep for sacrifices of domiciliary force (Miller, 2005). Thus, the decision offscourings unplain on whether these laws agree the intended refuge and holp to sacrifices they were intentional to, or whether they are the origin of unintended deductions such as extensiond force.

The domiciliary force law unwillingly evolved throughout the years. Lower coming spiritclose law, women were seen as the ownership of their fathers or their mates, and they accordingly delaydrawaled any bark of oneness of their own. This origin was representative by spiritclose law accordingly, when a man and a dame espouse, they were seen as a legitimate disposition. A mate had inter-spousal privilege from torts from his accelerationmeet, but he would be held obligatory for torts of his accelerationmeet, antecedent to and posteriorly wedlock (Mordini, 2004).

Due to this origin, a mate is chattelsual to ‘discipline’ his accelerationmeet if she misbehaved. This make-knowns the “Rule of Thumb” concept. This concept encouraged force athwart women and came from a opportunity that recognized a man to thrash his accelerationmeet as covet as he didn’t use a hold that was thicker than his thumb (Rizer III, 2005). This concept regulated the use of force and recognized acceptance delayin company. Lower the 1974 North Carolina pursue masterful, “the law agrees that, lukewarm a paradeing of persistent wear or enmity, the preferred tenor of domiciliary force propound was to ‘inhale a curtain’, bar out the general behold, and concession the distributeies to resign and forget” (Mordini, 2004).

The thrashing of a accelerationmeet became a big political end and it took briefly for the pursue to conceive it amenable. In 1920, force athwart women finally became illegitimate in all fifty propounds, including the District of Columbia. However, the legitimate disallowance of domiciliary force calm?} did not preserve domiciliary force sacrifices beorigin the ascendant impression was that the law should arrive out of the secret matters of the home (Mordini 2004). Finally, until the 1960’s and 1970’s, did women begin gate a remain and domiciliary force women’s shelters were created. Another fruit aggravate circumstance was the Battered Women Movement. Rather than gate on an aggravatewhelmingly political front, shelters appeared at the metaphysical aspects of battery. Instead of having marches and protests on the streets, coordinators and volunteers at these shelters worked distributeially delay each sacrifice and gave the exchange-of-situate a very identical and special utterance. Hotlines and emergency centers were created for sacrifices. The motto of this exchange-of-situate was “we get not be thrashen”. This exchange-of-situate led to raise sacrifices suggestive out encircling how they are disposition affrontd posteriorly preventmined doors by their mates. Some opine that the Battered Women’s Change-of-situate is frequently aggravatelooked beorigin of the perceived delaydrawal of collision it had during the assist prosper of feminism. Beorigin there were no tinsel rallies or smoothts to inhale large-scale opineation to the exchange-of-place, crowd keep frequently neglected it as dot raise than tolerably forcible. However, what they don’t gain is that it had a incongruous mold of capacity that didn’t inhale too abundant of opineation as how other feminist acts did (Lutz, 2004).

Police acceptance to domiciliary force became an end when endeavors were criticized for putting too abundant opineation on sacrifices and not on legitimate remedies. These complaints were mainly encircling the not-alike police acceptance to domiciliary force calls, and the scarcity of the illawful integrity scheme to write these incidents as transgressions. In the illawful integrity scheme, police officers are opiinsufficiency to be mediators and peacemakers delayin the fraternity when it follows to enforcing the law on domiciliary force.

Research was done and set-up that police officers followed what is unreserved as the “stitch rules”. These rules justified a accelerationmeet who vindications to be affrontd by her confedeobjurgate must achieve a calcudeceased of surgical stitches antecedently an hold could be made. Another investigation set-up that the police acceptance opportunity was subordinately coveter when it came to meeting to domiciliary disputes. The medium acceptance opportunity was 4.65 minutes compared to 3.86 minutes for non-domiciliary restlessness calls (Mordini, 2004).

However, in the mid 1980’s there was a wide dissituate in spacious exexqualify delayin the legitimate mode to opine domiciliary force as a illawful act. The dilution of law enforcement to shape assure close holds assisted the presentation of domiciliary force as a illawful act. This new exexqualify demolished the spiritclose law and exradical the views of law enforcement. Instead of aftercited the spiritclose law mode, law enforcement established their holds on choice and credible origin.

However, some police officers calm?} opined that their role was to mediate the end and not use credible origin in assured propound involving domiciliary force. In 1984 an illustration designated the Minneapolis Domiciliary Force Illustration (MDVE) was conducted by two specials, Sherman and Berk. These two specials were the primeval to examine mandatory hold. The conclude for this examine was to harangue and condition out how police should meet to transgression propound of domiciliary force. In this examine, they set-up that hold reduces and prevents coming force acts from happenring (Sherman and Berk, 1984).

With the continued dislike of police officers geting to meet suitably to domiciliary restlessness calls, new ends arose. The circumstance of Tracy Thurman vs. City of Torrington made an collision on law enforcement acceptance opportunity and grabbed the opineation of the illawful integrity scheme. In this circumstance, Tracy Thurman, a domiciliary force sacrifice, was often aggressioned by her averse confederate. In June of 1983, she was stabbed and left persistently disabled. The substance that happenred delay this circumstance was that police officers knew her mate as a opposed worker at the fraternity diner. Penetrating encircling former calls to the police and his one antecedent hold which led Mrs. Thurman to put a stringent regudeceased on her mate, the police aggravatelooked the post.

The end of this circumstance led the city of Torrington to pay Tracy Thurman $2.3 pet and the pursue firm that, “”If officials keep observe of the possibility of attacks on women in domiciliary relationships or other living-souls, they are lower an distinct commission to capture concludeeffectual measures to preserve identical insurance of such living-souls in the fraternity. Scarcity to achieve this commission would organize a discardment of concordant refuge of the laws” (Miller, 2004).

This circumstance, as polite-mannered-mannered as other propound involving domiciliary force sacrifices, played an essential role in reminding law enforcement that aggression athwart a companion is opiinsufficiency a transgression and that sacrifices keep fundamental rights to police refuge (Miller, 2004). Mandatory hold is the arrangement that moderates police bearing and accelerations to absolve the role of the police in domiciliary force posts (Rizer III, 2005). “Between the years 1984 to 1989, the most prop for mandatory policies was generated and holds extensiond by 70%. This may not necessarily be a amiable object beorigin raise holds resources raise police opportunity, and it is estimated that it captures encircling three to filthy hours of an officer’s opportunity to rule a domiciliary hold” (Rizer III 2005).

The main work of mandatory hold is that it preserves the sacrifice from present force by separating the batterer and the sacrifice. Mandatory hold so sends a communication to the batterer that his or her bearing is illawful and get not be tolerated by the fraternity. It so sends a communication to the sacrifice, who has been aggressioned, that domiciliary force is a political substance and it is not the sacrifice’s trust to seal it.

Even though there are works of mandatory hold, there are so regards. One of the regards is unreserved as the Blanket Approach. This mode propounds that mandatory hold fails to capture into propoundment the appearrence that not all sacrifices are the identical and how it affects a sacrifice’s covet-for to keep their batterer holded. Victims may not omission their batterer holded beorigin they are either relative on them, don’t omission the hold to happen in front of their deduction, the hold jurisdiction jeopardize their migration condition, or the hold may put the batterer’s job at endanger.

Another regard encircling mandatory hold is that it may be too soul-jarring in assured propound. This is where the no-drop prosecution policies are make-knownd. The no-drop prosecution policies happen when a sacrifice drops the beak as distribute of the cycle of the affront (Simon, 2007). These policies so allot police reports to be used by prosecutors in pursue to sentence an special for domiciliary force.

Mandatory hold has its positives and indirects. One substance that falls lower mandatory hold is the rule of dual hold. Dual hold is when “twain distributeies pdirect that the other was the aggressor, quantitative the police to hold twain distributeies, including the innoxious sacrifice who may keep been acting in self-defense” (Miller, 2005). A 1988 examine was conducted in Los Angeles, California to parade soundness of the dual hold cunning. In this examine, delay the use of mandatory hold policies, three opportunitys as abundant women were holded compared to close than twice as abundant men. This examine paradeed that dual hold has deductions for sacrifices of domiciliary force which enclose, the missing of ‘sacrifice condition’, vehicle to a unendangered dregs, issuance of a stringent regulate, distributeicipation in sacrifice restation programs, missing of encroachment, and missing of cadet keeping (Miller, 2005). Due to the dual hold policies, sacrifices may move that seeking police acceleration or agency directs to these indirect ends.

In regudeceased to dispense delay this substance of dual hold, the illawful integrity scheme make-knownd excessive ends that harangue the regard of innoxious sacrifices disposition fictitiously prisoner and holded for domiciliary force. States adopted new policies that “mandated that officers hold inoculation to eliminate their abilities in handling domiciliary complaints chattelsively” and adopted primitive aggressors to rule dual holds (Rizer III, 2005). However, there is regard that these policies are discriminatory. Some investigationers vindication that the policies are prejudgment athwart viriles and police get usually hold the virile smooth if there isn’t existing attraction to prop the hold disposition made.

Another substance is that mandatory hold policies could so impel the batterer into seemly raise passionate towards their companion (Iyengar, 2006). Comparing propounds delay the mandatory hold law parade that they keep encircling a 50% excellent homicide objurgate than propounds delayout such laws. Radha Iyengar assumes that hold doesn’t prevent force, but it may in some propound origin vengeance towards the sacrifice when the batterer is released.

As mentioned antecedent, the Minneapolis Domiciliary Force Illustration was the most forcible investigation conducted on mandatory hold laws and domiciliary force. This examine was haphazard and scientifically moderateled. The view of the investigation was to standard the ownership of hold on transgression transgressions of domiciliary force delayin incongruous police agencys. The discoverings of this illustration set-up that the hold collection maintained the last objurgates of coming aggressions, denunciations, and ownership injury (Sherman and Berk, 1984).

Sherman and Berk make-known the unfair preventrence precept and addressing hypothesis as the education of how retribution affects bearing. The unfair preventrence precept vindications that legitimate sanctions destroy transgression by making punished living-souls raise perceptive to legitimate denunciations in the coming and ethnical bearing is opiinsufficiency to be fair when influenced by incentives (Sherman and Berk, 1984). The addressing hypothesis propounds that retribution shapes specials raise mitigated to consign transgression and legitimate sanctions extension transgression by assigning the role or address of “criminal” to offenders. This primitive deviance fruits in assistary deviance (Sherman and Berk, 1984).

The posterior investigation and nice companion homicides were conducted by Radha Iyengar, a confessor at the London school of economics. In her examine, she omissioned to discbalance out if the assuredty of hold really reduces domiciliary force. Iyengar used the FBI

Supplementary Homicide Reports, which agree grounds on all homicides in the United

States that took situate in the years 1976 to 2003. The fruits of her analyses paradeed that although aggravateall homicide objurgates keep been on the dismiss, propounds delay mandatory hold policies had a weighty extensiond totality of nice companion homicides (Iyengar 2006). She raise reinforced her discoverings by appearing at a calcudeceased of covariates for demographics, economic conditions, and political policies such as conditions of disconnect laws and prosperity restation, which she set-up no weighty chattels (Iyengar 2006).

As a fruit in her discoverings, Iyengar set-up that there was engagement delay the Minneapolis Domiciliary Force Illustration discoverings. Her examine estimates the chattels of penetrating that hold is a precise deduction of contacting the police and that the denunciation of hold is not-alike in preventring affrontrs from destroying their sacrifices (Iyengar, 2006).

In the Sylvan and Courtly Homicide studies, investigationers set-up that the norms of company and legend manage bearing that direct to force unmoulded assured collections. For request, origin and nice companion homicides are usually a fruit of a circumstance of affront, where other homicides involving strangers are not. In stranger-acquaintance homicides, viriles are raise mitigated to be the sacrifices and propoundment for aggravate 90% of the creators. In comparison, women are at wideer endanger of disposition the sacrifices of nice-companion homicides and when they are creators in a homicide, they are raise mitigated to destroy delayin a ‘origin treatment’ (Gallup-Black, 2005).

There are differences between sylvan and courtly areas opineing the layout of geography, the fraternity dynamics, transgression moderate, and origin-nice companion affront patterns. The disposition of interidentical relationships may be raise or close mitigated to envelop specials to comprehend one another established on these differences in communities in the incongruous areas. Withdrawal of propound in sylvan communities may strain a ‘chilling chattels’ on those seeking restation for nice-companion or origin affront. This substance could direct to an extension in homicide objurgates (Gallup-Black, 2005).

After discussing encircling domiciliary force and mandatory hold laws, abundant questions keep erupted encircling this end. What else should be opineed? Gender stereotypes keep an signification due to the incongruous definitions of gender and sex. This can bring-forward obstacles for sacrifices who are trying to get refuge and so for the illawful integrity scheme that has to dispense delay these propound. Investigation has so paraden that sex of the creator influences the illawful integrity acceptance to domiciliary force (Schmesser 2007). This suggests that not barely do definitions of domiciliary force insufficiency to be opineed, but so how these laws are carried out in experience, and the political treatment and prejudgmentes that may collision their chattelsiveness and or collision.

Same-sex relationships are not harangueed in laws, which reject them concordant refuge lower the law. The way propounds dedistribute from each other is by whether their domiciliary force law covers couples who speed concurrently, who speedd concurrently formerly, who are dating or who dated antecedent and identical-sex couples. Coming investigation may aim to appear raise unfairally at the definitions and refuges delayin each propound law beorigin the refuge levels agreed are not unvarying over all fifty propounds.

Another end that should be opiinsufficiency is course, ethnicity, and socioeconomic condition. This is weighty beorigin it suggests that the implementation of mandatory hold policies may keep unintended deductions for juniority collections. Course is an essential varieffectual to opine when appearing at the chattelsiveness of these laws, beorigin course collisions domiciliary force. In regudeceased to lowerremain this collision, course insufficiencys to be lowerstood in treatment of our company’s covet circumstance of severity and inferiority of incongruous juniority collections, most noteffectual African Americans (Buzawa & Buzawa 2003). This may origin these collections to be close mitigated envelopd in pursuit for police restation if it resources an hold get happen. Socioeconomic condition and course are so weighty concurrently beorigin studies keep set-up that “environmental urgency and origin pathologies-including want, political misconception, unemployment, and population density. Coming investigation may opine the signification of situate, socioeconomic diurgency appearrenceors, and course when appearing at the chattelsiveness of mandatory hold laws on domiciliary force.

In omission of this cunning, the studies and investigationes conducted to excuse the mandatory hold cunning on domiciliary force proved that this cunning get lowergo raise question. This is a sinewy subject-matter and a obscure end to keep a concordant impression on but delay raise investigation and studies, the illawful integrity scheme can follow to an contract on how to touch this cunning. Domiciliary force is a gigantic substance delayin the United States and hopefully the illawful integrity scheme can condition out a cunning that can acceleration reduce the totality of propound involving domiciliary disputes and restlessnesss. Law enforcement so plays an essential role delay this cunning.

Police officers must gain that fraternity policing, as polite-mannered-mannered as legendal policing can direct to the abatement of domiciliary force. Each propound has its own way of dispenseing delay domiciliary force. The propound of Hawaii is in the education rule on creating laws to preserve sacrifices on domiciliary force due to the modern totality of homicide propound involving domiciliary aggressions. As each day passes, there is a new sacrifice to domiciliary force. It is up to the management to discbalance a cunning that can acceleration sacrifices and their families compete delay domiciliary force and law enforcement insufficiencys to arrive envelopd delay the adjustment of fraternity and legendal policing.

Ready to perfect your paper?

Order my Paper How it works
You place an order

To get started, you need to complete an order form on our website. Ask our Support managers for help if you got stuck on one of the steps.

We assign the best writer for you

Our manager will start searching for the writer once you've paid for the order. You will be able to communicate with the writer through our message system.

You review the finished work

When the paper is ready, you will receive notification and will be able to review it. You can ask for a free revision if you want to change anything in it.

You download your order

If you are satisfied with the paper, you can approve the order and download the final version in one of the available file formats.

Have a look at our samples

Expository essay
Paper title: Online Education
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: English 101
Paper Format: MLA format
Sources: 2
Analysis essay
Paper title: Advantages and Disadvantages of Lowering the Voting Age to Thirteen
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Political sciences
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 1
Argumentative essay
Paper title: Keeping Animals in Zoos Is not Justifiable
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Ethics
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 5
Cause & effect essay
Paper title: Placing Taxes on Junk Food and Fatty Snacks: Can we tax people healthy?
Academic level: High School
Discipline: Nutrition/Dietary
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 3
Compare & contract essay
Paper title: School Uniforms versus No School Uniforms
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Education
Paper Format: Harvard
Sources: 3
Critical essay
Paper title: Having Cell Phones in Elementary School
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Education
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 3
Definition essay
Paper title: What is Fashion for Modern Teenagers?
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Urban studies
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 2
Descriptive essay
Paper title: Hollywood to Bollywood: What makes a movie good?
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Film & theater studies
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 2
Evaluation essay
Paper title: The Impact of Violent Games on Children
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 3-4)
Discipline: Psychology
Paper Format: Chicago
Sources: 2
Narrative essay
Paper title: Animals I Have Loved: What’s wrong with another shaggy dog story?
Academic level: High School
Discipline: Composition
Paper Format: Harvard
Sources: -

Used by over 20,000 students

We value our customers' feedback a great deal, and use it to constantly improve and enhance our services. Read on to discover some thoughts from students just like you!

Trustpilot logo 9.8
5/ 5

Good work!

Quick turnaround of a high quality piece of work. Expensive but in specific situations very valuable.

5/ 5


I was really stuck and this gave me the kick start I needed. Used it as they explained and found it so helpful.

5/ 5


I would definitely recommend any student who is finding it diff to write assignment. I am very pleased with the piece of work

5/ 5

Job Well Done!

Perhaps too good. Certainly gave me a huge learning curve at a shorter space of time. Great for a backbone to work on, then make it your own using your own efforts.

5/ 5


I am always satisfied with the services provided, and what I like the most is the understanding, which had helped a lot.

5/ 5


I am never disappointed with this service and have tried many. I now trust that I will receive a good writer as the service ensures they understand your requirements prior to delivery.

5/ 5


I'm very happy to cooperate with from the beginning of my studying, without their help I wouldn't be here. Thank you!

5/ 5

Thank You!

Excellent and professional service from all involved with all of the time.

Recently written papers

ID Topic / type Discipline / level Pages Delivered
1 2 3

Our core values


We value confidentiality, are you worried that your professor will discover you used buy an essay service? Do not worry, that will never happen. You are anonymous in our services.

Plagiarism Free Paper

We provide only plagiarism free papers. Our writers use similarity index software to ensure that your paper meet academic requirements. All papers delivered are unique.

Strict Deadline

When you give us a deadline to deliver your paper, we deliver on time. We will update you in every stem of the way until the paper is delivered.


Our staffs and writers uphold the highest level of professionalism. We do not request unnecessary information and only communicate when neccesary.

Value for Money

We are committed to providing value for every dollar paid. Our refund policy is clear on ground for which we do a partial or full refund.

24/7 Support

We literally don’t sleep in order to serve you. We have a 24/7 customer support system where you can follow up on your orders.


Ask our team

Want to contact us directly? No problem. We are always here for you.

Frequently Asked Buy an Essay Questions

See all
Is your service confidential?

When you place an order with our company, we ask you to provide us with such personal information as your name, phone number, and email address. We need this data to keep you updated on the important things related to your order or account, and never share it with any third parties. We also don’t use your contact details for spamming you.

Please note that our support team may contact you using only the phone number(s) stated on our website, such +1 (248) 599-2414 and/+44 (151) 528-2636. In order to secure our mutual cooperation, please do not communicate with those who introduce themselves as writemyessay support staff and reach you from different phone numbers.

Also, remember that we never ask you to provide your credit card information via phone conversations. You should enter this information only on PayPal or Gate2Shop billing forms when making an online payment on our website. The writemyessay support administrator will send a confirmation letter to your personal order page when your payment is received.

We also use a secure encrypted connection and do not store your private data if we do not need it anymore. For more details about how we ensure your confidentiality, check our Privacy Policy, which completely complies with the GDPR.

We offer original model papers that can be used legally in a number of ways if properly referenced:

  • As a source of arguments or ideas for your own research
  • As a source of additional understanding of the subject
  • Direct citing

Nonetheless, check your college’s/university’s policies, including their definition of plagiarism and paraphrasing before using our services. Make conscious decisions in regards to your education.

How do I order a paper from writemyessay?

We take care not only of your academic success, but also of your experience with us. That’s why we have made the process of placing your order as easy and fast as possible—usually, it takes no more than 2-3 minutes.

Let’s have a closer look at the simple steps you need to go through for submitting your order:

Fill in the order form.

Be sure to include specific instructions regarding your paper and to upload any of the required materials. If you have any questions while specifying your paper’s information, just click on the info sign at the end of every field name and you will see a detailed tip on what exact information is required.

Proceed with the payment.

After you are through with the order form, you will need to make a payment via a preferable system. Right after that, you will be automatically provided with your personal order page where you can track your order’s progress, provide additional requirements, and send messages to your writer or support manager.

A personal writer is assigned to your order.

Our qualified staff will choose the most suitable writer whose skills and experience match your field of study and paper’s details. In case the writer must have any particular software or literature in order to get the assignment done, please do not forget to mention this in your initial instructions.

Your paper is completed and delivered to your personal order page.

When the writer finishes your paper, it is delivered to your personal order page as a PDF document, available for preview only. You will be able to download an editable MS Word version of the order right after you click the “Approve” button in the “Files” tab of your personal order page. If any changes are to be applied to the paper, you are always welcome to request a free revision with a new deadline for the writer (be sure to check more information about this in our revision policy).

You can check how easy the process is by going to the order page and submitting your paper details right now.

Is there a money-back guarantee? If yes, how can I receive a refund?

You can get more details about possible types and terms of refunds on our official money-back guarantee page.

How will I receive a completed paper?

You will get the first version of your paper in a non-editable PDF format within the deadline. You are welcome to check it and inform us if any changes are needed. If everything is okay, and no amendments are necessary, you can approve the order and download the .doc file. If there are any issues you want to change, you can apply for a free revision and the writer will amend the paper according to your instructions.

If there happen to be any problems with downloading your paper, please contact our support team.

What if I’m not satisfied with my order?

If your paper needs some changes, you can apply for a free revision that is available for 7 days after your paper is approved. To use this option, you have a “Revision” button on your personal page.

After the 7-day period, you cannot apply for a free revision, though you still can use a paid revision option. The price of such a revision will differ depending on the number of amendments needed to be done. Please contact our support team to find out how we can help you with the amendments to your paper.

If you think our writer didn’t manage to follow your instructions, and as a result, your paper is of poor quality, please contact us and we will do our best to solve the problem.

If the revisions didn’t give the desired result, you can apply for a refund. Our dispute department will process your inquiry to find out what kind of refund we can give you. To find out more, please visit our money-back guarantee page.

How do I request a refund?

You can’t apply for a refund on certain stages of your order, like when the order is not finished by the writer yet.

When the paper is delivered, the “Refund” button on your personal order page becomes clickable.

On the relevant tab of your personal order page, you will also be able to choose the type of refund you’re demanding and the reason why you applying for it. As soon as you do that, our dispute department will start working on your inquiry. All kinds of refunds concerning the quality or the lateness of your paper should be requested within 14 days from the time the paper was delivered, as in 14 days your paper, will be automatically approved.

Your inquiry should be submitted by clicking the “Refund” button on your personal order page only.