Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Literature Review on Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Chronic low tail refusal (CLBP) is a senior bloom posterity in the western cosmos-vulgar and is a momentous load on bloom thrift; Americans consume $37 billion annually delay a raise $19.8 billion obsolete in nonresidence [1]. There is 58% personality end custom of tail refusal in the UK, a 22-65% 1-year custom and 6-7% of all adults enjoy trustworthy tail problems [2].

Although CLBP is ordinaryly benevolent (<1% thoughtful pathology [3]) yet there are manifold curative approaches. Acupuncture has befit a ordinary composition but its competency has not been sufficiently demonstrated.

Modern (Verum) acupuncture originates in senile Chinese philosophy which claims refusal and distemper patent owing of imbalances in bodies forces of Yin and Yang. It is believed these forces glide through odious orders (meridians) and can be manipulated using odious acupuncture tops to reprocure the estimate. Acupuncture has evolved from the transmitted Chinese impression and some styles incorporating adjuncts such as electrical stimulation of the acupuncture scarcityle [4],

A new-fangled irrelative retrospect of catechism published among 1966 and February 2003 [4] concluded that the efficiency of acupuncture on CLBP was illogical due to the low methodological attribute of separated studies. They base acupuncture had some blunt-term progresss in refusal and operation compared to govern or ghost but due to low methodological attribute they concluded a scarcity for eminent attribute studies.

This retrospect updates that con-aggravate [4] by including catechism published behind February 2003 or studies that were published former but were of proud union and methodological attribute. The extrinsic is to stipulate stable misrecords environing the efficiency of acupuncture therapy for CLBP.

METHODS

Study Election Criteria

Only wildised governled sufferings (RCTs) adapted in English and adapted unconditional of advise were interjacent.

Search Strategy

In October 2009 the MEDLINE groundsbase (misrecord 1950 to end) was pursuited for RCTs published behind February 2003 and matching the pursuit string “Chronic low tail refusal” AND “acupuncture” OR “dry scarcityling” OR “Sham” OR “Placebo” AND “randomised governled suffering” OR “randomized governled suffering”. Raise pursuites using PEDro, Web of Science (using ISI Web of Knowledge) and Cinahl (misrecord 1982 to end) (see sequel A). Each catechism intimation register was as-polite used as a fountain of applicable publications.

Participants

For inclusion the studies participants scarcityed to be =18-years old delay non-odious CLBP. Non-odious CLBP was defined as refusal among the 12th absorbal boundary and the supplemental gluteal folds =12-weeks. If radiating leg refusal was offer this must be resultant to the lumbosacral territory refusal. RCTs that interjacent participants delay odious pathologies as the source origin of their CLBP, such as venom, prolapse of =1 inter-vertebral disc or spinal severance were enclosing.

Interventions

Studies that investigated the amiables of transmitted (Verum) acupuncture, trigger-top acupuncture and dry scarcityling were retrospected. RCTs were interjacent inattentive of index of electro-stimulation. Studies investigating non-needle fixed acupuncture, such as laser acupuncture, were enclosing. Govern mediations interjacent ghost, ordinary thrift, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) or unrepealed orthopaedic therapy.

Outcome gauges

There are filthy remainder gauges considered to be momentous when assessing CLBP

  • Pain concentration (e.g. visual analogue flake (VAS-P), numerical rating flake (NRS-P))
  • A global gauge (e.g. Overall progress, proportional rectification of endurings)
  • A tail odious operational foothold gauge (e.g. Roland-Morris Incompetency Questionnaire (RMDQ))
  • Return to fruit (absenteeism, accelescold of restore)

RCTs must enclose =1 of the aggravate.

The primeval remainders were refusal and operation.

Study election

A entirety of 544 studies were base through the pursuites delay 17 hypothetically prime RCTs signed. Of these 5 were enclosing due to con-aggravate duplication (n=1), unmarried inclusion of participants delay odious CLBP (n=2) or use of non-needle fixed acupuncture (n=2).

The retaining 12 catechism were retrospected using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) to singularize their methodological attribute. CASP enables the irrelative retrospect of an RCT for investigateness, pur-pose, project and forced. Assessment criteria interjacent wildization and alcolonization of participants, blinding of participants and partners, identification of virtual witness prejudgment, participant mass at RCT begin and misrecord, offeration and hit of results, and any signed seasonations. Results were recitative and documented (Appendix B).

RCT basealities:

  • Participants were enclosing: if they exhibited contraindications to acupuncture, had ordinary acupuncture for their CLBP formerly, former spinal surgery, communicated spondylopathy, venom, incarnate spine ugliness, compression severance due to osteoporosis or spinal stenosis.
  • No separations in demographic variables or baseline planes of refusal and incompetency were unmasked among the assemblages at baseline (P >0.05).
  • Randomization was computer-generated delay wild compute tables.
  • All participants gave assured agree.
  • Each RCT ordinary immaterial approval
  • Usual thrift is defined as a alliance of drugs, physiotherapy and use.

RESULTS

[5] 298 participants delay CLBP =6-months wildised to 12 sessions of acupuncture (n=146) or ghost acupuncture (n=73) aggravate 8-weeks, administering therapists had =140 hours grafting and 3-years habit, delay a third tardy acupuncture assemblage (n=79) who ordinary no acupuncture for the judicious 8-weeks prospered by the acupuncture assemblages protocol. Remainder gauges were VAS-P and tail operation using the validated German Funktionsfragebogen Hannover-Rücken (FFbH-R) questionnaire. At 8-weeks VAS-P decreased from baseline in all assemblages; behind 26 and 52-weeks the acupuncture assemblage’s results were amend than ghost at-last separations were not momentous. Results from the tardy acupuncture assemblage prospered the acupuncture assemblages’ exemplar. The suffering had amiable methodological attribute: remainder gauges were assessed unconnectedly delay participants completing questionnaires, self-reproach was unexcited (18%) but the acupuncture assemblage was enfold the capaciousness of the others which may enjoy influenced results.

[6] 638 participants delay CLBP =3-months wildised to gauge acupuncture (n=185), singularised acupuncture (n=157), ghost acupuncture (n=162) or ordinary thrift (161) assemblages. Acupuncture assemblages ordinary 10 compositions aggravate 7-weeks by acupuncturists delay =3 grafting. The Primeval remainder gauge was RMDQ. Compared to baseline all assemblages showed reformd operation and refusal at 8-weeks. Mean values for RMDQ were compatible up to 52-weeks delay the ordinary thrift assemblage having main dysoperation than all acupuncture assemblages (P=.001). There was no momentous separation among actual and ghost acupuncture assemblages (P>0.05). All forms of acupuncture had advantageous and persisting amiables aggravate ordinary thrift for CLBP composition delay clinically meaningful operational progresss. There were no momentous separations among acupuncture assemblages. Remainder gauges were collected by blinded telephone interviewers and self-reproach was low (6%) resulting in amiable suffering inside investigateness

[7] 1162 participants delay CLBP =6-months wildised to 5-weeks of twice-weekly acupuncture (n=387) or ghost acupuncture (n=387), movablesed by acupuncturists delay =140 hours grafting. A third assemblage ordinary ordinary thrift (n=387). Remainder gauges were Von Korff Constant Refusal Grade Flake (GCPS) and Hanaggravate Negotiative Ability Questionnaire (HFAQ). Results were offered as a percentage of progress in operation and refusal at 6-month prosper-up. At 6-months twain acupuncture assemblages had momentous progresss in refusal and operation compared to baseline and ordinary composition. There was no separation among acupuncture assemblages (p=0.39). The suffering was methodologically brawny delay amiable inside investigateness: the govern assemblage was an erratic multimodal ordinary therapy, had proud influence delay symmetrical caution, prosper-ups at 1.5, 3 and 6-months, low self-reproach (4%) and estimated dynamic wildisation. This was a amiable, proudly applicable, capacious, firm suffering.

[8] 35 participants, =65-years, delay CLBP =6-months wildised to 1 of 3 assemblages receiving 2 3-week views of 30-minute acupuncture sessions, delay a 3-week space-betwixt among. Assemblage A (n=12) ordinary gauge acupuncture, Assemblage B (n=10) external trigger-top acupuncture and Assemblage C (n=13) penetrating trigger-top acupuncture. Remainder gauges were VAS-P and RMDQ mandible. Assemblage C showed a statistically momentous VAS-P and RMDQ contractions from baseline behind view 1 delay VAS-P contraction persisting aggravate 12-weeks. There was no momentous contraction in VAS-P or RMDQ for either other assemblages. The RCTs methods are illustrative polite at-last slender exemplification capaciousness, proud dropout (27%), blunt-term prosper-up and virtual prejudgment scant inside investigateness

[9] 26 participants, =65-years, delay CLBP =6-months wildised to 2 assemblages. Aggravate 12-weeks each assemblage ordinary 1 view of trigger-top acupuncture and 1 view of ghost acupuncture delay a 3-week infringe among. Assemblage A (n=13) ordinary trigger-top view primeval prospered by ghost, Assemblage B (n=13) vice-versa. Acupuncturist had =4-years grafting and =7-years clinical habit. Remainder gauges were VAS-P and RMDQ mandible. Behind view 1 Assemblage A had momentously inferior VAS-P (P<0.001) and RMDQ mandibles (P<0.001) than assemblage B. Twain assemblages showed momentous delayin-assemblage decreases in VAS-P (P<0.001) and RMDQ mandibles behind trigger-top acupuncture but not during ghost. At 12-weeks amiables were not sustained. This suffering was illustrative polite but suffers from the corresponding bluntcomings as the 2004 RCT by the corresponding authors.

[10] 60 participants delay CLBP =6-months wildised them to 6-weeks of 30-minute weekly sessions of either acupuncture (n=30) or placebo TENS (n=30). No details of administering therapists were consecrated. The primeval remainder gauge was VAS-P. Although acupuncture showed proudly momentous separations in all the remainder gauges among pre- and post-treatment, the separations among the 2 assemblages were not statistically momentous. Generally the RCT was poor: therapists were not blinded, proud noncompliance (23.3%), cointerventions command enjoy influenced results, the dropout scold was not explained and there was no intention-to-treat decomposition.

[11] 131 participants 18-65 years old delay CLBP =6-months were wildised to assemblages receiving 20 30-minute sessions of transmitted and hearsay acupuncture (n=40), physiotherapy (n=46) or ghost acupuncture and physiotherapy (n=45), aggravate 12-weeks. Remainder gauges were VAS-P and refusal incompetency index (PDI). Behind 12-weeks of composition the acupuncture assemblage showed momentously poor refusal and incompetency compared to the physiotherapy assemblage but not compared to the ghost assemblage. At 9-months the acupuncture assemblage was further efficacious than physiotherapy in reducing incompetency singly and not contrariant to ghost. The suffering was methodologically brawny but blunt-term dropout was 24% and long-term 37%. The composition scheduled was five-a-week for 2-weeks then weekly for 10-weeks which may not be clinically serviceable.

[12] 55 participants =60 yrs, delay CLBP =12-weeks were wildised to 2-weeks of twice-weekly acupuncture and electrical stimulation balancebalance ordinary thrift (n=31) or ordinary thrift sole (n=24). Primeval remainder was RMDQ. At 6-weeks results manifest clinically and statistically momentous progresss in the acupuncture assemblage for refusal and incompetency compared to govern. Goods remained and singly impaired subordinately at 9-weeks prosper-up. The suffering was methodologically brawny: estimated wildisation, conspicuous methods, low self-reproach (14%). Participant inclusion criteria interjacent former imaging seasoning openisability.

[13] 186 participants senile among 20 and 60 delay CLBP =6-week were wildised to 4-weeks of ordinary thrift sole (n=60) or delay either acupuncture (n=65) or ghost acupuncture (n=61). Acupuncturists were habitd doctors serviceable in Beijing. Primeval remainder gauge was VAS-P. Forthdelay behind composition 65% of the acupuncture assemblage reputed a =50% contraction in VAS-P compared to 34% of the ghost assemblage and 43% of the ordinary thrift assemblage. At 3-months 79% of the acupuncture assemblage, 29% of the ghost assemblage and 14% of the ordinary thrift assemblage reputed a =50% VAS-P contraction. Methodological attribute was proud: estimated (stratified) wildisation and excellently illustrative methods at-last there was 30% self-reproach at 3-month prosper-up and grounds store was from open practitioners ascititious to virtual work prejudgment.

[14] 241 participants, senile 18-65, delay CLBP for 4 to 52-weeks were wildised to 10 sessions of acupuncture (n=160) or to ordinary thrift (n=81) aggravate 3-months. Acupuncturists were grafting for =3-years and =12.8-years clinical custom. Remainder gauges were SF-36 refusal mandibles and Oswestry low tail refusal incompetency questionnaire (ODI) charmed at baseline, 3, 12 and 24-months. A influence caution symmetrical a required 100 participants per assemblage to unmask a 10-top separation on SF-36 (90% influence and 5% discernment plane). A 5 top separation in SF-36 was reckoned momentous. The compute of participants in the acupuncture assemblage was increased to 160 to apportion for among-acupuncturist movables, ordinary thrift assemblage decreased to 80 participants delayout influence waste. Results were offered as top separations among wildisation, 12 and 24-months. At 12-months a 5.6 top mediation movables separation in SF-36 refusal was base and 8 top at 24-months. No composition movables was base for any other extent of SF-36 or ODI. Participants were symbolical of UK population, wildisation was estimated, methods were wholly documented and acupuncture compositions were singularised resulting in proud methodological attribute and openisability. At-last 25% of participants were unaccounted for at misrecord reducing inside investigateness.

[15] 11630 participants delay CLBP =6-months were allocated to three assemblages. Assemblage A were ordinary 15 singularised acupuncture sessions delay ordinary thrift as scarcityed (n=1549). Assemblage B ordinary tardy acupuncture delay ordinary thrift as scarcityed (n=1544). Assemblage C decomposed to be wildised but ordinary 15 singularised acupuncture sessions delay ordinary thrift (n=8004). Composition was aggravate 3-months. Remainder gauges were FFbH-R and SF-36 refusal mandibles. At 6-months the acupuncture assemblage showed momentous progresss in FFbH-R and SF-36 refusal compared to gradation thrift sole. The capacious exemplification capaciousness and coarse inclusion criteria meant results were openisable at-last assemblages were contrariant at baseline and findings signed a attribute of wildisation election.

[16] 52 participants delay CLBP =6-months were wildised to 4-weeks of physiotherapy delay daily 1-hour electro-acupuncture sessions (n=26) or gauge physiotherapy (n=26). Remainder gauges were refusal (NRS-P) and operation using the Aberdeen-LBP. There was a momentous contraction in NRS-P and Aberdeen-LBP mandibles in the acupuncture assemblage forthdelay behind composition and at 1 and 3-months prosper-up. Methodological attribute was scant by practicable divulsion of blinding single-mindedness due to stagnation of enduring blinding and intellectual remainder gauges.

DISCUSSION

Acupuncture vs. no composition

Two proud attribute studies (11928 vulgar) [5] and [15] base acupuncture further efficacious in blunt-term refusal contraction and operational progresss than no (delayed) composition. At-last twain studies were weakened by scant blinding and participants were recruited from newspaper adverts [5] or an security conorder [15] seasoning openisability; twain of which refer results dependence.

Acupuncture vs. ghost

Studies comparing acupuncture and ghost acupuncture (2460 vulgar) ([5], [6], [7], [11] and [13]) base twain efficacious at reducing refusal and increasing operation compared to baseline gauges; at-last no con-aggravate base a clinically momentous separation among assemblages Delay five methodologically investigate sufferings all reporting resembling results clinicians can enjoy dependence in the competency of acupuncture or ghost-acupuncture in refusal and operational progresss. At-last delay no clinically momentous separation among assemblages, placebo movables seems to be a solid contributing content.

Acupuncture vs. ordinary thrift

Five RCTs comparing acupuncture and ordinary thrift (12164 vulgar) ([12], [13], [14], [15] and [16]) concluded that acupuncture was further efficacious at reducing refusal. Increased operation in the acupuncture assemblage compared to govern was reputed in 1 RCT [12] at 6- and 9-weeks, [15] at 6-month and another [16] investigated movables forthdelay behind composition and 1- and 3-months prosper-up; at-last 1 RCT [14] base no momentous progress in operation in their longer-term con-aggravate at 12 or 24-month. Unlike other papers retrospected, Thomas and colleagues used UK fixed participants who ordinary compositions in peculiar or GP clinics adding dependence to their misrecords when applied to the open UK population. From con-aggravate findings clinicians can enjoy dependence that the conjunction of acupuncture to their composition of CLBP accomplish be further efficacious than ordinary thrift sole.

Acupuncture vs. penetrating and external trigger-top acupuncture

One con-aggravate ([8] 35 vulgar) base violentest progresss in refusal and operation using penetrating trigger-point-acupuncture. At-last this con-over, occasion substance methodologically entire and having enduring and partner blinding, was scant by slender capaciousness, proud dropout (23%), blunt-term prosper-up and practicable capital prejudgment ascititious to poor clinical dependence.

Acupuncture vs. TENS

One RCT ([10] 60 vulgar) base momentous progresss using twain TENS and acupuncture but no momentous interassemblage separation aggravate 6-months. However, dependence in results are scant owing participants as-polite ordinary ordinary thrift and use so may enjoy reformd inattentive; raisefurther the con-aggravate had no therapists blinding, proud noncompliance (23.3%), mystic dropouts and no intention-to-treat decomposition.

Trigger-top acupuncture vs. ghost

In 1 cross-aggravate suffering ([9] 26 vulgar) trigger-top acupuncture was base to be further efficacious than ghost at-last slender exemplification capaciousness, proud self-reproach (23%), odious to blunt-term prosper-up and practicable prejudgment due to capital colonization (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Meiji University of Oriental Medicine) season dependence in findings.

LIMITATIONS

Studies were commsingly scant by substance unrepresentative: of the 12 studies 2 were UK fixed ([10], [14]), six odious participants by age ([8], [9], [11] [12], [13], [14]), 2 used participant refreshment methods which may enjoy introduced confluence prejudgment (newspaper adverts, [5], security conorder [15]) and five had underpowered exemplification capaciousnesss or non-symmetrical influence cautions ([8], [9], [11], [12], [13]). Extraneously symbolical exemplification assemblages the remainder gauges cannot be applied to the open population delay any reliability.

Discrepancies were noted in composition quantity delay govern assemblage participants receiving less economy than mediation participants [16].

Blinding was incompatible opposing studies: 1 con-aggravate ([5]) blinded participants in the acupuncture assemblages but not the tardy assemblage, 1 con-aggravate ([6]) blinded participants singly, filthy ([7], [8], [9], [13]) blinded partners and participant, 1 ([10]) blinded partners singly, 1 ([11]) blinded partners and participants but not acupuncturists, three ([12], [14], [15]) had no blinding and 1 ([16]) blinded partners but not participants.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some averment for the efficiency of acupuncture for CLBP; compared to no composition there was blunt-term ([5] 8-week and [15] 3-month) refusal contraction and operational progresss. Compared to ghost therapy twain showed resembling progresss in refusal and operation at blunt-term ([5] 8-week, [6] 8-week, [11] 12-week and [13] 3-month) and mid-term ([5] 6-month and 1-year, [7] 6-month, [11] 9-month) prosper-up but no momentous separation was unmasked among assemblages. Compared to ordinary thrift acupuncture showed momentous progresss in primeval remainder gauges at composition, blunt- ([12]6- and 9-week, [13]3-month, [16]1- and 3-month) and long-term ([15]6-month, [14]1- and 2-year) prosper-up. Compared to external and penetrating trigger-top all compositions showed progresss but none were momentously contrariant from each other. Twain acupuncture and TENS were base to result long-term ([10] 6-month) progresss but no momentous separation was base among mediations. Comparing trigger-top therapy to ghost, trigger-top was base to be further efficacious although benefits were not sustained. There is averment that acupuncture balancebalance other compositions relieves refusal and increases operation amend than singular therapies sole.

Further repursuit scarcitys to be conducted to singularize composition frequencies and sustainability of composition amiables. Efficacious ghost compositions scarcity to be open to demonstrate placebo movables compared to acupuncture and other therapy types.

Additional Resources

  • Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D, Lipton R. (2003). Obsolete causative end and absorb due to base refusal conditions in the US fruitforce. JAMA;290(18):2443-2454.
  • Maniadakis, N. and Gray, A. (2000) The economic load of tail refusal in the UK. Pain, 84, 95-103.
  • Koes BW, van Tulder MW and Thomas S (2006). Diagnosis and composition of low tail refusal. BMJ; 332, p1430-1434
  • Furlan AD, van Tulder M, Cherkin D, Tsukayama H, Lao L, Koes B, Berman B. (2005). Acupuncture and Dry-Needling for Low Tail Pain: An Updated Irrelative Retrospect Within the Framefruit of the Cochrane Collaboration. Spine 2005;30:944-963

Reviewed Journals

  • Brinkhaus B, Witt CM, Jena S, Linde K, Streng A, Wagenpfeil S, Irnich D, Walther HU, Melchart D, Willich SN. (2006) Acupuncture in endurings delay constant low tail refusal: a wildized governled suffering. Archives of inside cure. 166: 450-457.
  • Cherkin et al (2009) A wildized suffering comparing acupuncture, invented acupuncture, and ordinary thrift for constant low tail refusal.
  • Haake M, Muller H, Schade-Brittinger C, Basler HD, Schafer H, Maier C, Endres HG, Trampisch HJ, Molsberger A. (2007). German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for constant low tail refusal- wildized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-assemblage suffering delay 3 assemblages. Arch Intern Med. 167(17):1892-1898.
  • Itoh E, Katsumi Y, Hirota S, Kitakoji H. (2006). Goods of trigger top acupuncture on constant low tail refusal in old endurings – a ghost-supplemental wildised suffering. Acupuncture in Medicine. 24(1):5-12
  • ItohK. Katsumi Y. Kitakoji H. Acupuncture in Medicine. (2004) Trigger top acupuncture composition of constant low tail refusal in old endurings: a blinded RCT. 22(4):170-7,
  • Kerr DP, Walsh DM, Baxter D. (2003) Acupuncture in the skillful-matter of constant low tail refusal: a blinded wildized governled suffering. The clinical narrative of refusal. 19: 364-370
  • Leibing E, Leonhardt U, Koster G, Goerlitz A, Rosenfeldt JA, Hilgers R, Ramadori G. (2001). Acupuncture composition of constant low-tail refusal – a wildized, blinded, placebo-supplemental suffering delay 9-month prosper-up. Refusal 96 (2002) 189-196
  • Meng CF, Wang D, Ngeow J, Lao L, Peterson M, Paget S. (2003). Acupuncture for constant inferior tail refusal in older endurings: a wildized, governled suffering. Rheumatology. 42:1508-1517
  • Molsberger AF, Mau J, Pawelec DB, Winkler J (2002). Does acupuncture reform the orthopedic skillful-matter of constant low tail refusal – a wildized, blinded, governled suffering delay3 months prosper up. Refusal 99 (2002) 579-587
  • Thomas KJ, MacPherson H, Thorpe L, Brazier J, Fitter M, Campbell M J , Roman M, Walters S J, Nicholl J. (2006). Randomised governled suffering of a blunt order of transmitted acupuncture compared delay ordinary thrift for perennial non-odious low tail refusal. British Medical Journal.doi:10.1136/bmj.38878.907361.7C
  • Witt CM, Jena S, Selim D, Brinkhaus B, Reinhold T, Wruck K, Liecker B, Linde K, Wegscheider K, Willich SN. (2006). Pragmatic Randomized Suffering Evaluating the Clinical and Economic Competency of Acupuncture for Constant Low Tail Pain. American Narrative of Epidemiology 2006;164:487-496
  • Yeung CKN, Leung MCP, Chow DHK. (2003). The Use of Electro-Acupuncture in Conjunction delay Use for the Composition of Constant Low-Back Pain. The Narrative Of Alternative And Complementary Medicine..2003:9:4:479-490

Ready to perfect your paper?

Order my Paper How it works
You place an order

To get started, you need to complete an order form on our website. Ask our Support managers for help if you got stuck on one of the steps.

We assign the best writer for you

Our manager will start searching for the writer once you've paid for the order. You will be able to communicate with the writer through our message system.

You review the finished work

When the paper is ready, you will receive notification and will be able to review it. You can ask for a free revision if you want to change anything in it.

You download your order

If you are satisfied with the paper, you can approve the order and download the final version in one of the available file formats.

Have a look at our samples

Expository essay
Paper title: Online Education
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: English 101
Paper Format: MLA format
Sources: 2
Analysis essay
Paper title: Advantages and Disadvantages of Lowering the Voting Age to Thirteen
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Political sciences
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 1
Argumentative essay
Paper title: Keeping Animals in Zoos Is not Justifiable
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Ethics
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 5
Cause & effect essay
Paper title: Placing Taxes on Junk Food and Fatty Snacks: Can we tax people healthy?
Academic level: High School
Discipline: Nutrition/Dietary
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 3
Compare & contract essay
Paper title: School Uniforms versus No School Uniforms
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Education
Paper Format: Harvard
Sources: 3
Critical essay
Paper title: Having Cell Phones in Elementary School
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Education
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 3
Definition essay
Paper title: What is Fashion for Modern Teenagers?
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Urban studies
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 2
Descriptive essay
Paper title: Hollywood to Bollywood: What makes a movie good?
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Film & theater studies
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 2
Evaluation essay
Paper title: The Impact of Violent Games on Children
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 3-4)
Discipline: Psychology
Paper Format: Chicago
Sources: 2
Narrative essay
Paper title: Animals I Have Loved: What’s wrong with another shaggy dog story?
Academic level: High School
Discipline: Composition
Paper Format: Harvard
Sources: -

Used by over 20,000 students

We value our customers' feedback a great deal, and use it to constantly improve and enhance our services. Read on to discover some thoughts from students just like you!

Trustpilot logo 9.8
5/ 5

Good work!

Quick turnaround of a high quality piece of work. Expensive but in specific situations very valuable.

5/ 5

Bravo!

I was really stuck and this gave me the kick start I needed. Used it as they explained and found it so helpful.

5/ 5

Perfect!

I would definitely recommend Writemyessay.college any student who is finding it diff to write assignment. I am very pleased with the piece of work

5/ 5

Job Well Done!

Perhaps too good. Certainly gave me a huge learning curve at a shorter space of time. Great for a backbone to work on, then make it your own using your own efforts.

5/ 5

Perfect!

I am always satisfied with the services provided, and what I like the most is the understanding, which had helped a lot.

5/ 5

Brilliant!

I am never disappointed with this service and have tried many. I now trust that I will receive a good writer as the service ensures they understand your requirements prior to delivery.

5/ 5

Satisfied!

I'm very happy to cooperate with Writemyessay.college from the beginning of my studying, without their help I wouldn't be here. Thank you Writemyessay.college!

5/ 5

Thank You!

Excellent and professional service from all involved with Writemyessay.college all of the time.

Recently written papers

ID Topic / type Discipline / level Pages Delivered
1 2 3

Our core values

Confidentiality

We value confidentiality, are you worried that your professor will discover you used buy an essay service? Do not worry, that will never happen. You are anonymous in our services.

Plagiarism Free Paper

We provide only plagiarism free papers. Our writers use similarity index software to ensure that your paper meet academic requirements. All papers delivered are unique.

Strict Deadline

When you give us a deadline to deliver your paper, we deliver on time. We will update you in every stem of the way until the paper is delivered.

Professionalism

Our staffs and writers uphold the highest level of professionalism. We do not request unnecessary information and only communicate when neccesary.

Value for Money

We are committed to providing value for every dollar paid. Our refund policy is clear on ground for which we do a partial or full refund.

24/7 Support

We literally don’t sleep in order to serve you. We have a 24/7 customer support system where you can follow up on your orders.

Questions?

Ask our team

Want to contact us directly? No problem. We are always here for you.

Frequently Asked Buy an Essay Questions

See all
Is your service confidential?

When you place an order with our company, we ask you to provide us with such personal information as your name, phone number, and email address. We need this data to keep you updated on the important things related to your order or account, and never share it with any third parties. We also don’t use your contact details for spamming you.

Please note that our support team may contact you using only the phone number(s) stated on our website, such +1 (248) 599-2414 and/+44 (151) 528-2636. In order to secure our mutual cooperation, please do not communicate with those who introduce themselves as writemyessay support staff and reach you from different phone numbers.

Also, remember that we never ask you to provide your credit card information via phone conversations. You should enter this information only on PayPal or Gate2Shop billing forms when making an online payment on our website. The writemyessay support administrator will send a confirmation letter to your personal order page when your payment is received.

We also use a secure encrypted connection and do not store your private data if we do not need it anymore. For more details about how we ensure your confidentiality, check our Privacy Policy, which completely complies with the GDPR.

We offer original model papers that can be used legally in a number of ways if properly referenced:

  • As a source of arguments or ideas for your own research
  • As a source of additional understanding of the subject
  • Direct citing

Nonetheless, check your college’s/university’s policies, including their definition of plagiarism and paraphrasing before using our services. Make conscious decisions in regards to your education.

How do I order a paper from writemyessay?

We take care not only of your academic success, but also of your experience with us. That’s why we have made the process of placing your order as easy and fast as possible—usually, it takes no more than 2-3 minutes.

Let’s have a closer look at the simple steps you need to go through for submitting your order:

Fill in the order form.

Be sure to include specific instructions regarding your paper and to upload any of the required materials. If you have any questions while specifying your paper’s information, just click on the info sign at the end of every field name and you will see a detailed tip on what exact information is required.

Proceed with the payment.

After you are through with the order form, you will need to make a payment via a preferable system. Right after that, you will be automatically provided with your personal order page where you can track your order’s progress, provide additional requirements, and send messages to your writer or support manager.

A personal writer is assigned to your order.

Our qualified staff will choose the most suitable writer whose skills and experience match your field of study and paper’s details. In case the writer must have any particular software or literature in order to get the assignment done, please do not forget to mention this in your initial instructions.

Your paper is completed and delivered to your personal order page.

When the writer finishes your paper, it is delivered to your personal order page as a PDF document, available for preview only. You will be able to download an editable MS Word version of the order right after you click the “Approve” button in the “Files” tab of your personal order page. If any changes are to be applied to the paper, you are always welcome to request a free revision with a new deadline for the writer (be sure to check more information about this in our revision policy).

You can check how easy the process is by going to the order page and submitting your paper details right now.

Is there a money-back guarantee? If yes, how can I receive a refund?

You can get more details about possible types and terms of refunds on our official money-back guarantee page.

How will I receive a completed paper?

You will get the first version of your paper in a non-editable PDF format within the deadline. You are welcome to check it and inform us if any changes are needed. If everything is okay, and no amendments are necessary, you can approve the order and download the .doc file. If there are any issues you want to change, you can apply for a free revision and the writer will amend the paper according to your instructions.

If there happen to be any problems with downloading your paper, please contact our support team.

What if I’m not satisfied with my order?

If your paper needs some changes, you can apply for a free revision that is available for 7 days after your paper is approved. To use this option, you have a “Revision” button on your personal page.

After the 7-day period, you cannot apply for a free revision, though you still can use a paid revision option. The price of such a revision will differ depending on the number of amendments needed to be done. Please contact our support team to find out how we can help you with the amendments to your paper.

If you think our writer didn’t manage to follow your instructions, and as a result, your paper is of poor quality, please contact us and we will do our best to solve the problem.

If the revisions didn’t give the desired result, you can apply for a refund. Our dispute department will process your inquiry to find out what kind of refund we can give you. To find out more, please visit our money-back guarantee page.

How do I request a refund?

You can’t apply for a refund on certain stages of your order, like when the order is not finished by the writer yet.

When the paper is delivered, the “Refund” button on your personal order page becomes clickable.

On the relevant tab of your personal order page, you will also be able to choose the type of refund you’re demanding and the reason why you applying for it. As soon as you do that, our dispute department will start working on your inquiry. All kinds of refunds concerning the quality or the lateness of your paper should be requested within 14 days from the time the paper was delivered, as in 14 days your paper, will be automatically approved.

Your inquiry should be submitted by clicking the “Refund” button on your personal order page only.