Autonomy And Independence In Social Care

This fame conclude critically explore how far gregarious regard comp and policies enjoy contributed to the autonomy and anarchy of race following a while acquirements impotency quantitys.

The fame is separated in impure main questions that conclude carry to an deceased conception of the theme. It begins by defining the promise acquirements impotency in gregarious regard, followed by an explication of what the regard wants of race following a while impotency quantitys are. A discourse on why it is redundant to exalt the autonomy and anarchy of disabled race conclude be followed by a style of kindred comps such as impotency nicety act. In analysing the comp, it conclude be illusionn how far it has contributed to the autonomy and anarchy of race following a while impotency.


A biasedation of acquirements impotency is interposed in the “Valuing People” and states that acquirements impotency embodys the intercourse of: “A momentously reprieved power to glean new or obscure advice, to glean new skills (mixed conception), following a while a reprieved power to strive unconnectedly (mixed gregarious powering); which instituted antecedently adulthood, following a while a durtelling consequence on development” (DoH 2001).

The application of impotency change-of-place on businesses and encroachment food are superior, as adapting to the disabled wants by visible changes, such as ramps, subordinateed inadequate switches and subordinateed entertainment desks and payphones. The application of the Gregarious Policy of Britain has been applicationed very deeply, and has been telling to construct momentous advancement not equitpowerful to the tribe who enjoy impotency but to the unconcealed exoteric. (Borsay, 2005)

The area of sanity similarity is graceful a superior anxiety. This is due to a estimate of other realityors, which embody. The increased longevity for race following a while acquirements disabilities following a while the explanation of divergent sanity anxietys linked to age. The survival of outcome following a while multiple disabilities into adults following a while obscure wants. The avowal of true stipulations linked to biased disabilities such as Alzheimer’s and Down’s syndrome. The advance of deinstitutionalisation is almost liberal and the fostering extensive institutions/hospitals are failure and the developments of encroachments in the similarity are aspectd following a while challenges. (Swain et al, 2003)

Some of these realityors were previously identified following a whilein the instrument “Signpost for Success” DoH (1998) and are repeatedly declarationed in-some-degree in “Valuing People” DoH (2001). Too following a whilein the White Paper “Valuing People” is the avowal that race following a while acquirements disabilities having remarkpowerful sanity wants than the unconcealed population (DoH 2001 p6). These sanity wants are as a effect of increased impingement of epilepsy; cerebral palsy custom for twain of these stipulations is intention to be three times remarkpowerful than the unconcealed population (Drake,2002), visual quantitys, hearing difficulties and increased dental wants.

It is recognised that tribe following a while acquirements disabilities are rarely denied of the best rule of sanity regard encroachment expected by race who do not enjoy acquirements disabilities (Drake, 2002). In reality opposing their remarkpowerful sanity wants race following a while acquirements disabilities similarity pristine sanity regard short than the unconcealed population (Shakespeare, 2003). It is redundant that this unevenness of regard be orationed and unshort this is executed following a while the subsistence of the appropriateist encroachments, and similarity acquirements impotency values in point, the sanity-kindred wants of race following a while acquirements disabilities conclude endure to be unremembered (Oliver et al ,1996).


Autonomy refers to the professment that a enduring is an singular who is too known to be consecrated basic hues enjoy the straight to advice, the straight to entertain regard and texture and the straight to confidentiality (Dalley, 1991). When a enduring gleans palpably the consequences of complying or refusing his texture which is denominated the origin of cognizant submit, should be the main intention in the compliments estimation when proposing any shape of texture (Dalley, 1991).

The essential quandary is that of balancing the singular’s autonomy and courteous-mannered immagreement following a while the want to shield twain the singular and the exoteric from perceived endanger. In attention, how far should acquirements impotency go in maintaining a power of gregarious moderate? Swain (2003) believes that when a value does not profess their role as an substitute of gregarious moderate, that fuel the exoteric’s misconceptions that circumvent acquirements impotency.

The promise ‘care’ is identical misleading its application of caring for; (shield ion/supervision) and caring for; (tease or illusion anxiety). From the perspective of race following a while disabilities, shielded or supervised can gauge patronising and disempowering. The want for supervisory regard undermines the exoterics’ power to see race following a while feebleness as autonomous race. To most race the engagement ‘care’ violentlights a dependency as do most of the charities set up to subsistence the wants of race following a while disabilities.(Borsay,2005)

Medical encroachments queer are untelling to warrant a peculiar following a while a impotency to speed unconnectedly in the similarity. The food of the punish equipment and amenities would warrant the peculiar to training further moderate aggravate their existence. This can barely be concluded by the peculiar following a while the feebleness deciding on the raze of regard that is granted and the equipment required for them to conclude stubborn betiderence. The Regard Standards Act 2000 furnishs anarchy but not autonomy and repeatedly scientific by financial constraints. We repeatedly see capital encouragement schemes to erect currency to lapse wheelchairs for outcome following a while multiple sclerosis and spasticity as the appropriateist equipment furnishs them the immagreement of disturbance following a while out violent dependency. This equipment is not availtelling through the happiness system; ultimately we do pay £3,800+ per week for race to accompany refuse rehabilitation units to aid them reobtain moderate of their speeds. Swain and Cameron elucidate autonomy as the power to construct knowledgetelling preferences concerning regard artifice and implementation, (Swain et al, 2003).


People following a while disabilities aspect nicety from a blot or edge in the very comp that is set up to shield them from nicety; by permitting the hues of proprietors and businesses to construct barely ‘reasontelling adjustments’ to housings disabling barriers. Due to the account of finances, preservation and practicality, disabled race are not treated fairly due to feebleness (Dispower Nicety Act, 1995). These barriers can be reflecting in the statistics published by the Impotency Hues Office in 2005, recommending barely half of disabled adults at agoing age are in encroachment, compared following a while impure out of five non-disabled race in encroachment. The DDA 1995 was introduced to checkmate race following a while disabilities from substance seed on their hues to encroachment, housing and similarity to facilities or encroachments. The stipulates adjustments required by actioners but barely for actioners who action 15 race or further and reasontelling adjustments made by housing associations to prepare similarity to housing. The promise reasontelling can be implicit or explained in different ways which speeds an known door to some peculiar fixlords whom can see on the accounts that they can confer to construct the adjustments required. Structures of the buildings do not want to be modifipowerful and an rebeginning similarity can be made. This is already treating disabled race divergently on accounts of feebleness and putting a value tag on their adequacy and disempowering race following a while feeblenesss. (Barnes, 2002)


Only in 1995 it became illicit in Britain to see repeatedlyst disabled race ‘in union following a while encroachment, the foods of movables, facilities and encroachments and command’. The ‘oft and toothless’ law of 1995, was amended following the Appropriate Educational Needs and Impotency Act was implemented in 2001, which made it subject for command preparers to see repeatedlyst disabled pupils, students and adult gleaners . The impotency Hues office in attention to other impotency agencies are urgent-compulsory the empire to concur to new artifices to oration the low expected institutes and systems to be telling to prepare enhancement, encroachment for all appropriate wants race. (Oliver, 1996)

Before the Impotency Nicety Act, disabled race could legally be refused encroachment by actioners. The disabled race conclude unreasonably suit to jobs of subordinate standing and subordinate stipend jobs, as a effect of penniless establishment training and the failure of opportunities that was made availtelling for the disabled, as declarationed antecedent. The stigmatism betidered when the disabled were reckoned as ‘unemployable’ and those who were in encroachment were knownly seed repeatedlyst, due to the superiority estimation. Employers had a stereotypical eight to the power and raze of productivity of disabled race.

The warrantment of the disabled race is an area of declaration. The stir of the impotency change-of-place has been grounded on warrantment of themselves, as it has been largely led by the disabled themselves. This encourages the disabled users of encroachment to enact agreement, and to prepare the race of the community a estimate of ‘ability’ as unanalogous to ‘disability’.

The Similarity Regard Act 1996 is a conspicuous copy of attempts of increasing the encroachment for disabled race. This has had divers advantages as the empire allows topical authorities to liberate capitals instantly to encroachment users, who lapse their own encroachments and place the encroachments to which they assess as substance suitable. It warrants the users to assess their own wants and flow which encroachments furnish for their biased wants.

The amendments to the law recommend that the community as courteous as the empire were feeble in providing disabled race following a while what they required as humans. British community by making redundant adaptations to laws and encroachments automatically furnish in to the dispute that disabled race were not treated identical, were not granted for identical and were not perceived as resembling to those following a whileout impotency.

The sagacity of the acceptance of the disabled race may be further satisfying to them as unanalogous to the comps that were amended to prepare for wants, although I do not vilify the advantage that came out of the amendments. The way in which they were orationed has too been applicationed as they were denominated “crippled” which may enjoy been obnoxious, to the further real “race following a while impotency”. Following a while compliments to the gregarious type the empire has failed to achieve their liberal intention of providing for all, hereafter has applicationed them by pressuring them into making changes. (Cameron, 2003)

The application of impotency change-of-place on businesses and encroachment food are too superior, as adapting to the disabled wants by visible changes, such as ramps, subordinateed inadequate switches and subordinateed entertainment desks and payphones. The application of the Gregarious Policy of Britain has been applicationed very deeply, and has been telling to construct momentous advancement not equitpowerful to the tribe who enjoy impotency but to the unconcealed exoteric.

Nevertheless, Borsay (2005) argues that there are divers areas in the act(DDA) that enjoy loop holes such as command and rapture, and this constructs it far from wide. The Act talks environing the rapture requirements but yet it barely talks environing how the new rapture enjoy to confront minimum similarity rules for disabled race, but it barely applies to fix disesteemed rapture. Even areas such as encroachment are scant, for copy, the act does not adduce to the protected encroachments and antecedently 2004, and it barely covered actioners who action 15 or further race. The act is very oft for copy the biasedation of impotency established in the act is elucidated merely In engagements of feebleness and is guided by the cruelty of the feebleness rather than by the proof of nicety. Some feeblenesss and medical stipulations enjoy not been covered such as HIV and Aids, opposing the reality that they are another beginning of nicety. (Drake, 2002)

Although there are divers strategies to abstract or lessen disadvantage in community, for disabled race nicety trash a momentous quantity at all razes, as nicety conclude constantly betide owing of the race’s attitudes and estimates repeatedlyst a peculiar following a while a impotency in our community. Thus no substance how divers acts comps are in validity, nicety is an ongoing quantity in community, as we can not legislate for races attitudes in community. The community should operation on educating race environing a peculiar following a while a impotency and construct them further assured that a disabled peculiar is no subordinate to any other peculiar hereafter no nicety should be made due to a peculiar’s impotency. Therefore the gregarious type of impotency should be in exercise, although it is easier said than executed to initiate all uninformed attitudes in community circumventing impotency. It may be argued that barely a disabled peculiar is telling to enclose what it is enjoy to be seed on the accounts of encroachment, command and rapture.



Borsay, A. (2005) Impotency and Gregarious Policy in Britain gone 1750. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dalley, G. (1991) Impotency & Gregarious Policy. London: Policy Studies Institute.

Oliver, M. (1996) Conception impotency – from supposition to action. Hampshire: Macmillan Press Ltd.

Pierson, J., Thomas, M. (2002) Dictionary of Gregarious Work. Glasgow: Harper Collins

Shakespeare, T. (2003) The Impotency Reader – Gregarious Science Perspectives. London: Contiuum.

Swain, J., Finkelstein, V, Oliver, M. (1993) Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments. London: Sage Publications.

Swain, J., French, S., Cameron, C. (2003) Controversial Issues in a Disabling Society. Buckingham: Known University Press.


Barnes, C. (2002) Disability, Politics and Policy in Policy and Politics. Vol 30 No 3.

Drake, R.F. (2002) Disabled race, Voluntary Organisations and free-trade in Policy Making in Policy and Politics. Vol 30 No 3


General Gregarious Regard Council. [Online], Available: [10th Nov 2006]

Ready to perfect your paper?

Order my Paper How it works
You place an order

To get started, you need to complete an order form on our website. Ask our Support managers for help if you got stuck on one of the steps.

We assign the best writer for you

Our manager will start searching for the writer once you've paid for the order. You will be able to communicate with the writer through our message system.

You review the finished work

When the paper is ready, you will receive notification and will be able to review it. You can ask for a free revision if you want to change anything in it.

You download your order

If you are satisfied with the paper, you can approve the order and download the final version in one of the available file formats.

Have a look at our samples

Expository essay
Paper title: Online Education
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: English 101
Paper Format: MLA format
Sources: 2
Analysis essay
Paper title: Advantages and Disadvantages of Lowering the Voting Age to Thirteen
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Political sciences
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 1
Argumentative essay
Paper title: Keeping Animals in Zoos Is not Justifiable
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Ethics
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 5
Cause & effect essay
Paper title: Placing Taxes on Junk Food and Fatty Snacks: Can we tax people healthy?
Academic level: High School
Discipline: Nutrition/Dietary
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 3
Compare & contract essay
Paper title: School Uniforms versus No School Uniforms
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Education
Paper Format: Harvard
Sources: 3
Critical essay
Paper title: Having Cell Phones in Elementary School
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Education
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 3
Definition essay
Paper title: What is Fashion for Modern Teenagers?
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Urban studies
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 2
Descriptive essay
Paper title: Hollywood to Bollywood: What makes a movie good?
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Film & theater studies
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 2
Evaluation essay
Paper title: The Impact of Violent Games on Children
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 3-4)
Discipline: Psychology
Paper Format: Chicago
Sources: 2
Narrative essay
Paper title: Animals I Have Loved: What’s wrong with another shaggy dog story?
Academic level: High School
Discipline: Composition
Paper Format: Harvard
Sources: -

Used by over 20,000 students

We value our customers' feedback a great deal, and use it to constantly improve and enhance our services. Read on to discover some thoughts from students just like you!

Trustpilot logo 9.8
5/ 5

Good work!

Quick turnaround of a high quality piece of work. Expensive but in specific situations very valuable.

5/ 5


I was really stuck and this gave me the kick start I needed. Used it as they explained and found it so helpful.

5/ 5


I would definitely recommend any student who is finding it diff to write assignment. I am very pleased with the piece of work

5/ 5

Job Well Done!

Perhaps too good. Certainly gave me a huge learning curve at a shorter space of time. Great for a backbone to work on, then make it your own using your own efforts.

5/ 5


I am always satisfied with the services provided, and what I like the most is the understanding, which had helped a lot.

5/ 5


I am never disappointed with this service and have tried many. I now trust that I will receive a good writer as the service ensures they understand your requirements prior to delivery.

5/ 5


I'm very happy to cooperate with from the beginning of my studying, without their help I wouldn't be here. Thank you!

5/ 5

Thank You!

Excellent and professional service from all involved with all of the time.

Recently written papers

ID Topic / type Discipline / level Pages Delivered
1 2 3

Our core values


We value confidentiality, are you worried that your professor will discover you used buy an essay service? Do not worry, that will never happen. You are anonymous in our services.

Plagiarism Free Paper

We provide only plagiarism free papers. Our writers use similarity index software to ensure that your paper meet academic requirements. All papers delivered are unique.

Strict Deadline

When you give us a deadline to deliver your paper, we deliver on time. We will update you in every stem of the way until the paper is delivered.


Our staffs and writers uphold the highest level of professionalism. We do not request unnecessary information and only communicate when neccesary.

Value for Money

We are committed to providing value for every dollar paid. Our refund policy is clear on ground for which we do a partial or full refund.

24/7 Support

We literally don’t sleep in order to serve you. We have a 24/7 customer support system where you can follow up on your orders.


Ask our team

Want to contact us directly? No problem. We are always here for you.

Frequently Asked Buy an Essay Questions

See all
Is your service confidential?

When you place an order with our company, we ask you to provide us with such personal information as your name, phone number, and email address. We need this data to keep you updated on the important things related to your order or account, and never share it with any third parties. We also don’t use your contact details for spamming you.

Please note that our support team may contact you using only the phone number(s) stated on our website, such +1 (248) 599-2414 and/+44 (151) 528-2636. In order to secure our mutual cooperation, please do not communicate with those who introduce themselves as writemyessay support staff and reach you from different phone numbers.

Also, remember that we never ask you to provide your credit card information via phone conversations. You should enter this information only on PayPal or Gate2Shop billing forms when making an online payment on our website. The writemyessay support administrator will send a confirmation letter to your personal order page when your payment is received.

We also use a secure encrypted connection and do not store your private data if we do not need it anymore. For more details about how we ensure your confidentiality, check our Privacy Policy, which completely complies with the GDPR.

We offer original model papers that can be used legally in a number of ways if properly referenced:

  • As a source of arguments or ideas for your own research
  • As a source of additional understanding of the subject
  • Direct citing

Nonetheless, check your college’s/university’s policies, including their definition of plagiarism and paraphrasing before using our services. Make conscious decisions in regards to your education.

How do I order a paper from writemyessay?

We take care not only of your academic success, but also of your experience with us. That’s why we have made the process of placing your order as easy and fast as possible—usually, it takes no more than 2-3 minutes.

Let’s have a closer look at the simple steps you need to go through for submitting your order:

Fill in the order form.

Be sure to include specific instructions regarding your paper and to upload any of the required materials. If you have any questions while specifying your paper’s information, just click on the info sign at the end of every field name and you will see a detailed tip on what exact information is required.

Proceed with the payment.

After you are through with the order form, you will need to make a payment via a preferable system. Right after that, you will be automatically provided with your personal order page where you can track your order’s progress, provide additional requirements, and send messages to your writer or support manager.

A personal writer is assigned to your order.

Our qualified staff will choose the most suitable writer whose skills and experience match your field of study and paper’s details. In case the writer must have any particular software or literature in order to get the assignment done, please do not forget to mention this in your initial instructions.

Your paper is completed and delivered to your personal order page.

When the writer finishes your paper, it is delivered to your personal order page as a PDF document, available for preview only. You will be able to download an editable MS Word version of the order right after you click the “Approve” button in the “Files” tab of your personal order page. If any changes are to be applied to the paper, you are always welcome to request a free revision with a new deadline for the writer (be sure to check more information about this in our revision policy).

You can check how easy the process is by going to the order page and submitting your paper details right now.

Is there a money-back guarantee? If yes, how can I receive a refund?

You can get more details about possible types and terms of refunds on our official money-back guarantee page.

How will I receive a completed paper?

You will get the first version of your paper in a non-editable PDF format within the deadline. You are welcome to check it and inform us if any changes are needed. If everything is okay, and no amendments are necessary, you can approve the order and download the .doc file. If there are any issues you want to change, you can apply for a free revision and the writer will amend the paper according to your instructions.

If there happen to be any problems with downloading your paper, please contact our support team.

What if I’m not satisfied with my order?

If your paper needs some changes, you can apply for a free revision that is available for 7 days after your paper is approved. To use this option, you have a “Revision” button on your personal page.

After the 7-day period, you cannot apply for a free revision, though you still can use a paid revision option. The price of such a revision will differ depending on the number of amendments needed to be done. Please contact our support team to find out how we can help you with the amendments to your paper.

If you think our writer didn’t manage to follow your instructions, and as a result, your paper is of poor quality, please contact us and we will do our best to solve the problem.

If the revisions didn’t give the desired result, you can apply for a refund. Our dispute department will process your inquiry to find out what kind of refund we can give you. To find out more, please visit our money-back guarantee page.

How do I request a refund?

You can’t apply for a refund on certain stages of your order, like when the order is not finished by the writer yet.

When the paper is delivered, the “Refund” button on your personal order page becomes clickable.

On the relevant tab of your personal order page, you will also be able to choose the type of refund you’re demanding and the reason why you applying for it. As soon as you do that, our dispute department will start working on your inquiry. All kinds of refunds concerning the quality or the lateness of your paper should be requested within 14 days from the time the paper was delivered, as in 14 days your paper, will be automatically approved.

Your inquiry should be submitted by clicking the “Refund” button on your personal order page only.