Aquinass Five Ways To Prove Existence Of God Philosophy Essay

Aquinas’s “five ways” sets out to plant or excuse the creature of God by judicious instrument. The concludeings which Aquinas uses in his “five ways” are distantly influenced by what is unconcealed as the cosmological concludeing”. This concludeing says that Gods creature can be plantd naturalized on the ways in which we experiment the cosmos-inhabitants environing us. The unconcealed aim of the cosmological concludeing consequently is to try to plant how the earth came to be and essentially it to-boot favor to invent the “uncaused creator of everysubject else” .Influenced by this impression of the cosmological concludeing and to-boot distantly influenced by Aristotle, Aquinas favor to parade that in regulate for everysubject to stop, it chief required the “presence of colossus that stoped anteriorly everysubject else did”. This “chief presence” Aquinas persuades, is unconcealedly conjectured to be God! Linked to this, Aquinas’s to-boot held the impression that God fashiond the cosmos-inhabitants and all that was in it. Outparty God consequently the cosmos-inhabitants would not stop. To say that the undiminished cosmos-inhabitants is subsidy on a God whose creature has never been attested is a great pretightness to devise and concludes succeeding a while distant involvedies. Aquinas’s “five ways” consequently is an dissertation to stroke this concludeing and to plant that scholarship environing God can be prepared in give-heed-to already suited and barefaced to everybody (Natural Theology). In defective what I meditate Aquinas is trying to sketch less is the deed that we do not insufficiency to see God in regulate to venerate that he stops. By outlining the “five ways” Aquinas wants to parade that the way in which we experiment the cosmos-inhabitants environing us can in deed furnish satisfactory manifestation of God’s creature. Obtain?} the forthcoming sayments for specimen:

Nosubject bechances in the cosmos-inhabitants succeeding a whileout a conclude.

Events in the cosmos-inhabitants obtain?}-establish becreator of colossus else.

To chaffer succeeding a while the conclusion of unbounded regress, it is compulsory to recommend that twain the cosmos-inhabitants and the subjects in the cosmos-inhabitants must possess had a chief creator.

Tless is button to recommend that the aloft sayments are in any way mock but in developed deed they do not furnish us succeeding a while satisfactory concludes to venerate in God’s creature.

The aloft sayments consequently can be seen as the forestate or foundations for Aquinas’s “five ways” which are outlined as follows:

Motion: Silent in stipulations of transmute, Excitement beseems the chief scrutiny which Aquinas uses to give Gods creature .It is plum to all of us that transmute obtain?}-places all environing in the cosmos-people. Things transmute when germinative transmutes beseem developed transmutes. Solely developed transmutes can turn germinative transmutes into developed transmutes consequently developedity cancels out germinativeity. As button can be twain developedity and germinativeity in the corresponding appealence, it stands consequently that subjects cannot transmute or actuate themselves. Any transmute or excitement that obtain?}-places in the cosmos-inhabitants consequently must be transmuted or actuated by colossus other than itself. This arrange of transmute cannot go on to instantaneousness and it is compulsory to plant a rouseing summit which is put in excitement or transmuted by no other. This everyone comprehends as God. This is linked to Aristotle’s impression of God as the “unmoved actuater”. God in this wisdom creators other subjects to transmute but himself scum unchanged.

Efficient Causes: A arrange of fertile creators stop in the cosmos-people. Everysubject which we comprehend in this cosmos-inhabitants has been creatord by colossus other than itself. A subject is not the creator of itself. “If a deviseer fertile creator does not stop, neither does the subject that issues”. Consequently everysubject that stops insufficiencys a preface or chief creator of creature. Just as the arrange of excitement/transmute cannot go on to instantaneousness, neither can the arrange of fertile creators go on to instantaneousness. If this obtain?}-placered then the issue would be that button would stop at this give term. In an attempt to plum-up this total consequently it is compulsory for us to try to plant a chief fertile creator. In regulate for subjects to bechance in the cosmos-people, we insufficiency colossus to rouse them and this everyone assumes to be God! This conception is linked to Aristotle’s impression of “fertile and conclusive creators”.

Possibility and Necessity: All environing us in structure we confront subjects that are likely to be and to-boot subjects which are likely not to be. Tless was a actual summit when “things were not”. In this wisdom, the subjects that came into substance and that are less now must possess had a preface. If subjects were never in creature then well-balanced now button would stop. Tless must consequently be colossus which necessarily stops succeeding a whileout any other and which creators others to stop. This we appeal to as God. This links in succeeding a while Aquinas’s impression that if God does not stop then the cosmos-inhabitants cannot stop. This scrutiny is to-boot linked to Aristotle’s impression on causation.

Perfection (Gradation of Being): In the cosmos-people, we give-heed-to irnot-absolute gradations in subjects. Some subjects are imsubstantiate or worse than other subjects. Tless must be colossus consequently which is an terminal picturesqueness or wholeness. This we seduce God. [1] 

Design: This impression of the scheme concludeing can be linked to the cosmological concludeing and to-boot to Aristotle’s system of causation and system of devises. Tless is manifestation of scheme or cunning in the way that the cosmos-inhabitants is fashiond. This evokes the recommendion that tless is “room” for a schemeer. For specimen eyes and ears were specifically schemeed for vision and hearing, seasons are regulateed so that plants conquer exaim year succeeding year and the ozone flake is totally positioned so as to fortify us from any injurious u-v rays. To-boot Moons, stars, planets and the sun etc. cannot determine their own establish in the earth. This again recommends manifestation that the cosmos-inhabitants did not scheme itself and consequently colossus must possess schemeed the cosmos-inhabitants or creatord the cosmos-inhabitants to stop. This “designer” or “creator” is unconcealedly silent to be God. Genesis 1 influences this impression of the scheme concludeing wless it emphasises that God fashiond the cosmos-inhabitants and all that was in it. Novel cosmologists on the other laborer would persuade at-terminal that the cosmos-inhabitants originated from the “big bang”. Less we can see a combat emerging betwixt credulity and comprehending and this combat can possess great possessions for the way in which we aim to plant or “disprove” the creature of God in the cosmos-people.

The aloft “five ways” possess dissertationed to interpret to us how we can be apprised of Gods creature through the sundry irnot-absolute ways that we speed in and experiment the cosmos-inhabitants environing us. As our straightforward scholarship of God calm?} scum very poor to conclusion at-last, it is consequently no startle that these “five ways”, and in-truth trust in God in unconcealed has faced multifarious challenges aggravate the years. Becreator we cannot comprehend God straightforwardly through the wisdoms it beseems past involved to give or plant his creature. Aquinas’s “five ways” in my impression at-last, offers a cheerful criteria succeeding a while which we can follow to demonstrate the creature of God in the cosmos-people. However, I must promote that I lean a subordinately particular impression in the wisdom that I conclude from Christian enhancement wless credulity in God is distantly relevant. In my own single impression, I venerate that anyone who concludes from a credulity enhancement conquer abundantly recognize and comprehend each of Aquinas’s “five ways”. Coming from the other party of the spectrum at-last, I am trusting that multifarious inhabitants would confront it involved in some ways to be sure by Aquinas’s concludeings if they do not already venerate in God. For specimen, it may be perceived that Aquinas is too lax and conceal in some of his concludeings, especially the terminal two which include wholeness and scheme. To-boot it may conclude opposite as if Aquinas is reducing scrutinys of God’s creature to these “five” unconcealed principles. Aquinas to-boot “speaks succeeding a while extensive slavery and avoids sweeping unconcealedizations”. This can be seen for specimen in concludeing three wless Aquinas does not specifically say that all restricted subjects are subsidy but rather he appeals to how we are apprised that ” some subjects conclude into substance and ignoring away”. To-boot it could be recommended that Aquinas’s “five ways” are a dirty out-dated now that we comprehend a dirty past environing the earth. During the term when Aquinas was adaptation these concludeings it can be silent that he was easily influenced by the ancients such as Plato and Aristotle. Gone then the entrance of novel comprehending has conclude into play and as a issue Aquinas’s “five ways” could be rendered as “irrelevant”. In inmain of the impression of novel comprehending, let us now obtain?} a dirty contemplate end to each of the five ways and invent how they may be overlooked as having no unequivocal input to providing scrutinys for the creature of God.

In stipulations of excitement, novel comprehending would persuade that: excitement is no longer a wealth of one subject but in deed is a wealth of at last two subjects which include an “witness and an object”. In termination consequently “tless can be no “unmoved actuater” gone all excitement is now unconcealed to be not-absolute to the witness, and not to some unmoving appealence”.

In relative to fertile creators, the forthcoming concludeing beseems satisfactory:

“St Thomas’ forestate less is barely adverse naturalized on our scholarship that subject is subsidyly deviseed as tittles and antiparticles, and constantly annihilated when a tittle meets an antiparticle”. As a issue, tless are no subjects which are creatord or fashiond by other subjects. Things solely transmute “in devise and tless is button substance “caused to stop””.

This concludeing to-boot leaves the investigation “if God creatord everysubject in the cosmos-inhabitants to stop then who or what creatord God to stop”?

Possibility and necessity: The impression that some substance, i.e. God creatord the earth to stop, does not medium that that substance is not a subsidy substance. The Gnostic Demiurge legend ends up this pretension. Aquinas persuades that the earth was fashiond and consequently it is subsidy. The Big bang system on the other laborer persuades that the cosmos-inhabitants did in deed possess a plum preface environing 15 billion years ago. It to-boot clfavor that the earth is not subsidy due to the deed that it undergoes cycles of “Bang, dilution, befoulment, crunch>Bang”.


“The mysteries of structure were unplum in the term of St Thomas Aquinas. Alchemy was comprehending and the substance of administer could be clear into gold. The laws of thermodynamics, oxidation and radioactive consumption were 550 years or past in the future…Thomas barely did not possess the deeds. Tless is no scrutiny in the concludeing from degrees and wholeness”.

Design: The concludeing despite scheme says that the earth came environing as an termination of “the big bang”. If this is the instance then God did not scheme or fashion the earth and the concludeing for scheme which Aquinas uses in his “five ways” is rendered as adverse.


It is plum from researching this dissertation that tless is a extensive whole of tightness embracing the scrutinys of God’s creature. On the one laborer tless are the theologians and those of credulity enhancements who would undoubtedly follow to plant that God stops. Thomas Aquinas “five ways” can be seen less as an attempt to do impartiality to this concludeing. On the other laborer at-terminal tless are those who pretightness that naturalized on philosophical manifestation tless is no conclude to recommend that tless is any God at all. All of the concludeings which influence the creature of God in Aquinas’s “five ways” consequently can be robbed naturalized on philosophical axioms. Looking at twain partys of the concludeings twain from a theological/credulity perspective and to-boot from a philosophical perspective, we can see that twain partys possess satisfactory manifestation to recommend that twain are amend in their impressions. Thus scum the investigation “is permission amend in aphorism that the creature of God can be plantd naturalized on Aquinas’s “five ways” or is philosophical manifestation amend in their trust that tless is as of yet no scrutiny of Gods creature in the cosmos-people”? The repartee in my impression goes as follows, those who conclude from a credulity enhancement and those who venerate in God conquer aim to recognize Aquinas’s “five ways” as providing satisfactory concludes to possess reliance in the creature of God. In deed these “five ways” conquer answer to plant what they already had credulity in. Those who do not venerate in God on the other laborer conquer aim to ally themselves succeeding a while the philosophical concludeing which favor to plant that tless is no manifestation for God s creature in the cosmos-people. Twain concludeings are amend in their impressions and as a issue it has beseem past involved to plant or “disprove” the creature of God in the cosmos-people.

On a conclusive music let me persuade that the creature of God has neither been plantd nor disproved and whether one choses to venerate or not to venerate is up to their own single excellent. For me singlely at-terminal credulity and credulity are distantly relevant deedors. As a Christian, I possess been brought to venerate in and possess credulity in God. This is probably why I confront Aquinas’s “five ways” so sensational in that they aid me to renew the trusts which I already lean. Although the philosophical concludeing does furnish some sound and sensational summits which may thwart my trust in God, I calm?} venerate that tless is a God in this cosmos-inhabitants who fashiond everysubject and who one day conquer devise himself unconcealed to all of man but until then I venerate that credulity is the most relevant deedor. If one venerates then one can see that God stops.

Ready to perfect your paper?

Order my Paper How it works
You place an order

To get started, you need to complete an order form on our website. Ask our Support managers for help if you got stuck on one of the steps.

We assign the best writer for you

Our manager will start searching for the writer once you've paid for the order. You will be able to communicate with the writer through our message system.

You review the finished work

When the paper is ready, you will receive notification and will be able to review it. You can ask for a free revision if you want to change anything in it.

You download your order

If you are satisfied with the paper, you can approve the order and download the final version in one of the available file formats.

Have a look at our samples

Expository essay
Paper title: Online Education
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: English 101
Paper Format: MLA format
Sources: 2
Analysis essay
Paper title: Advantages and Disadvantages of Lowering the Voting Age to Thirteen
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Political sciences
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 1
Argumentative essay
Paper title: Keeping Animals in Zoos Is not Justifiable
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Ethics
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 5
Cause & effect essay
Paper title: Placing Taxes on Junk Food and Fatty Snacks: Can we tax people healthy?
Academic level: High School
Discipline: Nutrition/Dietary
Paper Format: APA
Sources: 3
Compare & contract essay
Paper title: School Uniforms versus No School Uniforms
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Education
Paper Format: Harvard
Sources: 3
Critical essay
Paper title: Having Cell Phones in Elementary School
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Education
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 3
Definition essay
Paper title: What is Fashion for Modern Teenagers?
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Urban studies
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 2
Descriptive essay
Paper title: Hollywood to Bollywood: What makes a movie good?
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 1-2)
Discipline: Film & theater studies
Paper Format: MLA
Sources: 2
Evaluation essay
Paper title: The Impact of Violent Games on Children
Academic level: Undergraduate (years 3-4)
Discipline: Psychology
Paper Format: Chicago
Sources: 2
Narrative essay
Paper title: Animals I Have Loved: What’s wrong with another shaggy dog story?
Academic level: High School
Discipline: Composition
Paper Format: Harvard
Sources: -

Used by over 20,000 students

We value our customers' feedback a great deal, and use it to constantly improve and enhance our services. Read on to discover some thoughts from students just like you!

Trustpilot logo 9.8
5/ 5

Good work!

Quick turnaround of a high quality piece of work. Expensive but in specific situations very valuable.

5/ 5


I was really stuck and this gave me the kick start I needed. Used it as they explained and found it so helpful.

5/ 5


I would definitely recommend any student who is finding it diff to write assignment. I am very pleased with the piece of work

5/ 5

Job Well Done!

Perhaps too good. Certainly gave me a huge learning curve at a shorter space of time. Great for a backbone to work on, then make it your own using your own efforts.

5/ 5


I am always satisfied with the services provided, and what I like the most is the understanding, which had helped a lot.

5/ 5


I am never disappointed with this service and have tried many. I now trust that I will receive a good writer as the service ensures they understand your requirements prior to delivery.

5/ 5


I'm very happy to cooperate with from the beginning of my studying, without their help I wouldn't be here. Thank you!

5/ 5

Thank You!

Excellent and professional service from all involved with all of the time.

Recently written papers

ID Topic / type Discipline / level Pages Delivered
1 2 3

Our core values


We value confidentiality, are you worried that your professor will discover you used buy an essay service? Do not worry, that will never happen. You are anonymous in our services.

Plagiarism Free Paper

We provide only plagiarism free papers. Our writers use similarity index software to ensure that your paper meet academic requirements. All papers delivered are unique.

Strict Deadline

When you give us a deadline to deliver your paper, we deliver on time. We will update you in every stem of the way until the paper is delivered.


Our staffs and writers uphold the highest level of professionalism. We do not request unnecessary information and only communicate when neccesary.

Value for Money

We are committed to providing value for every dollar paid. Our refund policy is clear on ground for which we do a partial or full refund.

24/7 Support

We literally don’t sleep in order to serve you. We have a 24/7 customer support system where you can follow up on your orders.


Ask our team

Want to contact us directly? No problem. We are always here for you.

Frequently Asked Buy an Essay Questions

See all
Is your service confidential?

When you place an order with our company, we ask you to provide us with such personal information as your name, phone number, and email address. We need this data to keep you updated on the important things related to your order or account, and never share it with any third parties. We also don’t use your contact details for spamming you.

Please note that our support team may contact you using only the phone number(s) stated on our website, such +1 (248) 599-2414 and/+44 (151) 528-2636. In order to secure our mutual cooperation, please do not communicate with those who introduce themselves as writemyessay support staff and reach you from different phone numbers.

Also, remember that we never ask you to provide your credit card information via phone conversations. You should enter this information only on PayPal or Gate2Shop billing forms when making an online payment on our website. The writemyessay support administrator will send a confirmation letter to your personal order page when your payment is received.

We also use a secure encrypted connection and do not store your private data if we do not need it anymore. For more details about how we ensure your confidentiality, check our Privacy Policy, which completely complies with the GDPR.

We offer original model papers that can be used legally in a number of ways if properly referenced:

  • As a source of arguments or ideas for your own research
  • As a source of additional understanding of the subject
  • Direct citing

Nonetheless, check your college’s/university’s policies, including their definition of plagiarism and paraphrasing before using our services. Make conscious decisions in regards to your education.

How do I order a paper from writemyessay?

We take care not only of your academic success, but also of your experience with us. That’s why we have made the process of placing your order as easy and fast as possible—usually, it takes no more than 2-3 minutes.

Let’s have a closer look at the simple steps you need to go through for submitting your order:

Fill in the order form.

Be sure to include specific instructions regarding your paper and to upload any of the required materials. If you have any questions while specifying your paper’s information, just click on the info sign at the end of every field name and you will see a detailed tip on what exact information is required.

Proceed with the payment.

After you are through with the order form, you will need to make a payment via a preferable system. Right after that, you will be automatically provided with your personal order page where you can track your order’s progress, provide additional requirements, and send messages to your writer or support manager.

A personal writer is assigned to your order.

Our qualified staff will choose the most suitable writer whose skills and experience match your field of study and paper’s details. In case the writer must have any particular software or literature in order to get the assignment done, please do not forget to mention this in your initial instructions.

Your paper is completed and delivered to your personal order page.

When the writer finishes your paper, it is delivered to your personal order page as a PDF document, available for preview only. You will be able to download an editable MS Word version of the order right after you click the “Approve” button in the “Files” tab of your personal order page. If any changes are to be applied to the paper, you are always welcome to request a free revision with a new deadline for the writer (be sure to check more information about this in our revision policy).

You can check how easy the process is by going to the order page and submitting your paper details right now.

Is there a money-back guarantee? If yes, how can I receive a refund?

You can get more details about possible types and terms of refunds on our official money-back guarantee page.

How will I receive a completed paper?

You will get the first version of your paper in a non-editable PDF format within the deadline. You are welcome to check it and inform us if any changes are needed. If everything is okay, and no amendments are necessary, you can approve the order and download the .doc file. If there are any issues you want to change, you can apply for a free revision and the writer will amend the paper according to your instructions.

If there happen to be any problems with downloading your paper, please contact our support team.

What if I’m not satisfied with my order?

If your paper needs some changes, you can apply for a free revision that is available for 7 days after your paper is approved. To use this option, you have a “Revision” button on your personal page.

After the 7-day period, you cannot apply for a free revision, though you still can use a paid revision option. The price of such a revision will differ depending on the number of amendments needed to be done. Please contact our support team to find out how we can help you with the amendments to your paper.

If you think our writer didn’t manage to follow your instructions, and as a result, your paper is of poor quality, please contact us and we will do our best to solve the problem.

If the revisions didn’t give the desired result, you can apply for a refund. Our dispute department will process your inquiry to find out what kind of refund we can give you. To find out more, please visit our money-back guarantee page.

How do I request a refund?

You can’t apply for a refund on certain stages of your order, like when the order is not finished by the writer yet.

When the paper is delivered, the “Refund” button on your personal order page becomes clickable.

On the relevant tab of your personal order page, you will also be able to choose the type of refund you’re demanding and the reason why you applying for it. As soon as you do that, our dispute department will start working on your inquiry. All kinds of refunds concerning the quality or the lateness of your paper should be requested within 14 days from the time the paper was delivered, as in 14 days your paper, will be automatically approved.

Your inquiry should be submitted by clicking the “Refund” button on your personal order page only.